2011
DOI: 10.1080/03650340903544515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tillage system and cotton residue management effects on soil physical and chemical properties of an Anatolian clay loam sown within a wheat-cotton sequence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). These results are in disagreement with that of Gürsoy et al (2011). Whereas, Ozpinar and Ozpinar (2015) found a significant decrease in soil bulk density, confirming our results, in top soil due to tillage practices in a five-year experiment at enhancing maize productivity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…3). These results are in disagreement with that of Gürsoy et al (2011). Whereas, Ozpinar and Ozpinar (2015) found a significant decrease in soil bulk density, confirming our results, in top soil due to tillage practices in a five-year experiment at enhancing maize productivity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The observed 9% SOM increase after five continuous incorporations of wheat and cotton residues was rather low considering the 17% SOM increase after continuous incorporation of wheat and cotton residues for three years (GURSOY et al, 2011) and 63% in a three year field experiment under maize-based system (ZELEKE et al, 2004). Low SOM increase in this study could be because of high summer temperatures prevailing in the study area as well as because of the nature of the crop constituents.…”
Section: Soil Organic Mattermentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A bulk-density reduction trend was observed with the expected increase in biomass incorporated into the soils, i.e., 1.37, 1.34, 1.31 and 1.31 mg m -3 at Awagat and 1.34, 1.30, 1.27 and 1.29 mg m -3 bulk density at Shahpur corresponding to FFU, BNM, INM and BNM+GM treatments, respectively. Increasing biomass input to the soil through residue incorporation and enhanced crop growth have been reported to improve soil quality relative to organic carbon and biotic activity (LAL, 1989;KARLEN et al, 1994), and this might be the reason for the significantly lower bulk density following BNM, INM and BNM+GM treatments. This assumption was further substantiated by the strong correlations (r = 0.87 and 0.90) observed between bulk density and organic carbon content in Awagat soil and Shahpur soil (p ≤ 0.05).…”
Section: Bulk Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations