2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time and reliability issues associated with automatic vs. manual measurements of Ankle to Brachial pressure Index (ABI) following heavy load exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using automatic devices allowed us to get rid of interindividual variability 29 and to reduce the time of measurement. 30 In conclusion, the present study provides, for the first time, objective evidence that the 'physiological' change in ABI increases with age. This reinforces the belief that the decrease in ABI at rest with age observed in general population studies likely results from the increased prevalence of participants with subclinical PAD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using automatic devices allowed us to get rid of interindividual variability 29 and to reduce the time of measurement. 30 In conclusion, the present study provides, for the first time, objective evidence that the 'physiological' change in ABI increases with age. This reinforces the belief that the decrease in ABI at rest with age observed in general population studies likely results from the increased prevalence of participants with subclinical PAD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…It should be kept in mind that the variability of manual recording is high and depends on the observer experience. Using automatic devices allowed us to get rid of interindividual variability29 and to reduce the time of measurement 30…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim was to homogenize the technique between the different centers in order to limit interobserver variability. There are contradictory publications with regard to using automatic measures of lower limb pressures at rest, but in the post‐exercise period, sphygmomanometers ensure simultaneous and quicker measurements . This is important as simultaneous measurements improve the detection of minor lesions after heavy load exercise compared to nonsimultaneous recordings …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the automatic ABI analysis at rest and also at post‐exercise, in the assumed normal population, ABI value was calculated as the average value of the two limb divided by the average value of the two arms. We previously showed that test‐retest reliability of automatic measurement after heavy load exercise was high with the standard error of measurement being 0.05 and coefficient of variation being 4.3% . Figure illustrates the measurement conditions for the test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%