2020
DOI: 10.1515/fca-2020-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-changed fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process

Abstract: We define a time-changed fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process by composing a fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with the inverse of a subordinator. Properties of the moments of such process are investigated and the existence of the density is shown. We also provide a generalized Fokker-Planck equation for the density of the process.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of such sufficient condition can also be seen from the phase portrait in Figure 3, as the maximum is reached in a region in which d Φ I Φ dt Φ is still strictly positive. Let us indeed recall that the classical Fermat theorem on extremal points (see, e.g., [60] Theorem 5.9) becomes an inequality in the non-local context (see, e.g., [61] Theorem 1 in the fractional case or [62] Proposition 2.2 in the general Caputo-type case), justifying the fact that, after the function reaches a maximum and starts decreasing, the non-local derivative could still be non-negative. Finally, let us observe that the lack of semigroup property can be overtaken by considering a deformation map θ, as shown in Appendix A, that takes in consideration the fact that the system remembers all its history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of such sufficient condition can also be seen from the phase portrait in Figure 3, as the maximum is reached in a region in which d Φ I Φ dt Φ is still strictly positive. Let us indeed recall that the classical Fermat theorem on extremal points (see, e.g., [60] Theorem 5.9) becomes an inequality in the non-local context (see, e.g., [61] Theorem 1 in the fractional case or [62] Proposition 2.2 in the general Caputo-type case), justifying the fact that, after the function reaches a maximum and starts decreasing, the non-local derivative could still be non-negative. Finally, let us observe that the lack of semigroup property can be overtaken by considering a deformation map θ, as shown in Appendix A, that takes in consideration the fact that the system remembers all its history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where D h t is a generalized time-fractional derivative of Caputo type, which is defined (for sufficiently good functions v : (0, ∞) → R of time variable t) via the Laplace transform (cf. [1]) by…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here − − 1 2 ∆ γ , γ ∈ (0, 1), is the fractional Laplacian [30]. Equation (1) serves as a governing equation for the process (Y E β t ) t⩾0 which is a symmetric 2γ-stable Lévy process (Y t ) t⩾0 time-changed by an independent inverse β-stable subordinator (E β t ) t⩾0 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equation of GGBM is the following time-stretched time-fractional heat equation Equation (3) reduces to the time-fractional heat equation (i.e. equation (1) with γ ∶= 1) if α ∶= β. For γ ∈ (0, 1), the time-and space-fractional heat equation ( 1) is shown to be the governing equation for another SSSI RSGP (see [45]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%