2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2018.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-consistent investment and reinsurance strategies for mean-variance insurers with relative performance concerns under the Heston model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the conditions in Dynkin's Theorem can be ensured by the smoothness of the functions, which are the assumptions of Theorem 3.4. Many studies have also removed the above restriction on the function space, see Liang and Song [22], Wu et al [45], Zeng et al [51], Zhu et al [56] and so on.…”
Section: Remark 8 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the conditions in Dynkin's Theorem can be ensured by the smoothness of the functions, which are the assumptions of Theorem 3.4. Many studies have also removed the above restriction on the function space, see Liang and Song [22], Wu et al [45], Zeng et al [51], Zhu et al [56] and so on.…”
Section: Remark 8 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that our selection of the ambiguity preference functions (23)-(24) are based on the expressions of q * 1 (t, x, l, u), q * 2 (t, x, l, u) and H(t, x, l; q * ) in equations (55), (56) and (11), such that the optimal control u deduced from the HJB equation (57) takes a linear form of variables x and l. Only with this linear form of u, we can separate equations (21) and (22) into a system of ODEs by the order of variables x and l, in other words, we can obtain analytical solutions for our problem.…”
Section: Remark 8 (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, we could see that the insurer's investment strategy π * 1 (t) in Theorem 3.1 which is similar to [28] contains two parts: the first part α−ρσ2 B(t) m1A(t) is standard component and the second part k α−ρσ2 B(t) m2A(t) is k times the reinsurer's investment strategy which is the hedge components coming from the relative concerns, and this means the insurer would imitate the reinsurer's investment strategy. Specifically, if the insurer does not take the wealth gap between itself and the reinsurer, and same as the reinsurer the amount invested in the risky asset is anti-related to the risk-averse coefficient (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…With respect to maximizing the expected utility of the relative performance, Bensoussan et al (2014) studied a non-zero-sum stochastic differential investment and reinsurance game between two insurers whose surplus processes were modulated by continuous-time Markov chains; Deng et al (2018) investigated the implications of strategic interaction between two constant absolute risk aversion (CARA) insurers on their reinsurance-investment policies with default risk under the framework of non-zero-sum stochastic differential game. There are still many studies on the non-zero-sum stochastic differential reinsurance-investment game problem, such as Meng et al (2015), Pun and Wong (2016), Guan and Liang (2016), Yan et al (2017), Zhu et al (2018), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%