2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time course and role of the pineal gland in photoperiod control of innate immune cell functions in male Siberian hamsters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one previous experiment, pharmacological injections of melatonin delivered daily 4 h before the onset of darkness (so as to lengthen the endogenous melatonin profile) mimicked the effects of short-days on febrile responses to a simulated infection, suggesting that the duration of melatonin is sufficient in this regard (Bilbo and Nelson, 2002); a similar paradigm yielded comparable results on circulating leukocyte concentrations (Prendergast et al, 2003b). Pineal dependence of innate immunity has been inferred from a study which maintained hamsters in constant light, suppressing endogenous melatonin secretion (Yellon et al, 2005); pineal dependence of adaptive immunity has been inferred from an experiment which exposed pinealectomized hamsters to short days for 1 week prior to antigenic challenge (Yellon et al, 1999b). The interpretation of these studies is not straightforward, given that: (1) daily melatonin injections also render the circadian system in a SD-typical state (Puchalski and Lynch, 1988;Margraf and Lynch, 1993), (2) little is known regarding the significance of the amplitude of melatonin signals on immune function, and (3) constant light renders circadian rhythms in a free-running state, functions as a stressor, and can be immunosuppressive (Morimoto et al, 1975;Ramaley, 1977;Larsen et al, 1994;Liebmann et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In one previous experiment, pharmacological injections of melatonin delivered daily 4 h before the onset of darkness (so as to lengthen the endogenous melatonin profile) mimicked the effects of short-days on febrile responses to a simulated infection, suggesting that the duration of melatonin is sufficient in this regard (Bilbo and Nelson, 2002); a similar paradigm yielded comparable results on circulating leukocyte concentrations (Prendergast et al, 2003b). Pineal dependence of innate immunity has been inferred from a study which maintained hamsters in constant light, suppressing endogenous melatonin secretion (Yellon et al, 2005); pineal dependence of adaptive immunity has been inferred from an experiment which exposed pinealectomized hamsters to short days for 1 week prior to antigenic challenge (Yellon et al, 1999b). The interpretation of these studies is not straightforward, given that: (1) daily melatonin injections also render the circadian system in a SD-typical state (Puchalski and Lynch, 1988;Margraf and Lynch, 1993), (2) little is known regarding the significance of the amplitude of melatonin signals on immune function, and (3) constant light renders circadian rhythms in a free-running state, functions as a stressor, and can be immunosuppressive (Morimoto et al, 1975;Ramaley, 1977;Larsen et al, 1994;Liebmann et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In Siberian hamsters, short days enhance natural killer cell cytolytic capacity and spontaneous blastogenesis in both whole blood lymphocytes and isolated lymphocytes (Yellon et al, 1999a). Circulating lymphocyte concentrations (e.g., T cells, B cells) are greater in short days relative to long days (Bilbo et al, 2002a;Prendergast et al, 2004a;Yellon et al, 2005). In addition, more integrative measures of immune function such as T-cell-dependent skin inflammatory responses, which depend in part on specific leukocyte subtypes (i.e., CD44+ and CD62+ leukocytes), are greater in short days relative to long days (Dhabhar et al, 2000;Bilbo et al, 2002a;Prendergast et al, 2004a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In common with reproductive responses, photoperiodic changes in immunity are dependent on pineal melatonin secretion (49). Temporally, photoperiodic changes in immune function appear to parallel changes in reproductive function (41,44,56). In light of the immunomodulatory role of gonadal hormones (5,29,40), photoperiodic changes in the immune system may arise exclusively as a consequence of photoperiod-driven changes in the reproductive system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short photoperiods (<13 h light/day) initiate gonadal regression and induce changes in numerous aspects of immune function, including increases in T and B lymphocytes (Bilbo et al, 2002a;Yellon et al, 2005), enhanced lymphocyte function (Yellon et al, 1999), and attenuated antibody responses (Demas and Sakaria, 2005). Species differences in immune responses to photoperiod exist, but a general trend toward improved immune function under short days is evident among long-day-breeding rodents (Nelson, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%