1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf01646745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dependent approach to scattering from impurities in a crystal

Abstract: A time dependent scattering theory for a quantum mechanical particle moving in an infinite, three dimensional crystal with impurity is given. It is shown that the Hamiltonian for the particle in the crystal without impurity has only absolutely continuous spectrum. The domain of the resulting wave operators is therefore the entire Hubert space.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
140
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
140
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In [22], the first named author proved that given a, b ∈ R d with |a| = 1 and a, b = 0, there exists δ ∈ R such that (1.2) ψ q ≤ C H ρ ψ p , for any ψ ∈ C ∞ (T d ) and any ρ ∈ R with |ρ| ≥ 2, where C is a constant independent of ψ and ρ, and 1 < p < 2 < q satisfy (1.3) 1 p + 1 q = 1, 1 p − 1 q = 2 d , i.e., p = 2d/(d + 2) and q = 2d/(d − 2). Using inequality (1.2) and L. Thomas's original approach [35], Shen established the absolute continuity of the spectrum of the Schrödinger operator −∆ + V (x) on L 2 (R d ), under the condition that the potential V is real, periodic and V ∈ L d/2 loc (R d ) [22]. In the case d ≥ 5, this improved the earlier results by Reed-Simon [21] and Birman-Suslina [4] , the Morrey class as well as the Kato class were carried out in [22], [24], [25].…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [22], the first named author proved that given a, b ∈ R d with |a| = 1 and a, b = 0, there exists δ ∈ R such that (1.2) ψ q ≤ C H ρ ψ p , for any ψ ∈ C ∞ (T d ) and any ρ ∈ R with |ρ| ≥ 2, where C is a constant independent of ψ and ρ, and 1 < p < 2 < q satisfy (1.3) 1 p + 1 q = 1, 1 p − 1 q = 2 d , i.e., p = 2d/(d + 2) and q = 2d/(d − 2). Using inequality (1.2) and L. Thomas's original approach [35], Shen established the absolute continuity of the spectrum of the Schrödinger operator −∆ + V (x) on L 2 (R d ), under the condition that the potential V is real, periodic and V ∈ L d/2 loc (R d ) [22]. In the case d ≥ 5, this improved the earlier results by Reed-Simon [21] and Birman-Suslina [4] , the Morrey class as well as the Kato class were carried out in [22], [24], [25].…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Schrödinger operator −∆ + V (x) on R 3 with real periodic potential V , L. Thomas [35] proved that the spectrum of the operator is absolutely continuous if V ∈ L 2 loc (R 3 ). This was done by using the analytic extension in the so-called quasi-momentum k and the resolvent estimates for a family of operators of the form (D+k) 2 +V on L 2 (R d /Γ).…”
Section: Theorem 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Hamiltonians on L 2 (Ê d ) with (rather general) d -periodic scalar potentials (only), the non-existence of flat bands has been proven several decades ago [66,54,69,15]. One class of UMF's, for which (2.9) was proven for all n ∈ AE 0 , concerns certain UMF's of a definite sign and is due to Iwatsuka himself.…”
Section: Definition 21 (Umf) a Unidirectionally Constant Magnetic Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, but each member of which is -periodic and hence has only absolutely continuous spectrum [66,54,69]. The dynamical characterisation of scattering states in Hilbert space by the RAGEtheorem [13,68] therefore implies (for the present situation of one dimension and without singular continuous spectrum) the second of the following two equalities …”
Section: Prop A25]) the Same Lines Of Reasoning Implymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the proof of Theorem 1.1, we apply Thomas' method (originating from [42] and used for checking the absence of eigenvalues in the spectrum of periodic elliptic differential operators). With the help of this method, in this section we reduce Theorem 1.1 to Theorem 1.2.…”
Section: Is Not An Eigenvalue Of This Operator)mentioning
confidence: 99%