2005
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐dependent involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in trace fear conditioning in mice

Abstract: Hippocampal and amygdaloid neuroplasticity are important substrates for Pavlovian fear conditioning. The hippocampus has been implicated in trace fear conditioning. However, a systematic investigation of the significance of the trace interval has not yet been performed. Therefore, this study analyzed the time-dependent involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the dorsal hippocampus in one-trial auditory trace fear conditioning in C57BL/6J mice. The NMDA receptor antagonist APV was injected bilat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
178
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
11
178
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, we (Czerniaswki et al, 2011) and others (e.g. Misane et al, 2005) have found that NMDA receptor antagonism within DH prior to training blocks the acquisition of trace fear conditioning. These data collectively suggest that DH may normally participate in both the acquisition and consolidation of trace fear conditioning, but is not necessary for either acquisition or recall.…”
Section: Histologycontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…By contrast, we (Czerniaswki et al, 2011) and others (e.g. Misane et al, 2005) have found that NMDA receptor antagonism within DH prior to training blocks the acquisition of trace fear conditioning. These data collectively suggest that DH may normally participate in both the acquisition and consolidation of trace fear conditioning, but is not necessary for either acquisition or recall.…”
Section: Histologycontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…The disruption of NMDAR signaling in the hippocampus disrupts trace, but not delay, fear conditioning (Misane et al, 2005). Our previous studies indicate that MgT treatment enhances NMDAR signaling and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus (Slutsky et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Mgt Treatment On Conditioned Fear Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Unlike delay conditioning where the tone (conditioned stimulus, CS) and shock (unconditioned stimulus, US) coterminate (49), trace fear conditioning, which places a time interval between the CS and US, makes both the contextual and auditory memories hippocampal-dependent (50)(51)(52)(53). Moreover, NMDARs in the hippocampus are also required for auditory (CS) memory following trace fear conditioning (51,52). There was no difference in the amount of freezing at baseline or at the end of fear conditioning across groups on day 1 (Fig.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%