2006
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/21/s04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dependent quantum simulations of two-qubit gates based on donor states in silicon

Abstract: Many quantum gate proposals make physical assumptions to ease analysis. Here we explicitly consider the effect of these assumptions for a particular two-qubit gate proposal, a cube-root-of-unity gate, in which the two qubits are donors in a semiconductor coupled via an intermediate 'control' spin. Our approach considers directly the electronic structures of the qubit and control impurity systems. We find that such gates are highly sensitive to environmental factors overlooked in analytically soluble models, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…construction and fidelity of two-qubit gates (e.g. such as the controlled-NOT) from this Hamiltonian Fowler et al, 2003;Hill andGoan, 2003, 2004;Kerridge et al, 2006;Tsai et al, 2009;Tsai and Goan, 2008). From a microscopic physics viewpoint, in general the exchange energy J is stronger than the dipole interaction for smaller separations, however it behaves as (Herring and Flicker, 1964)…”
Section: Two-donor Systems and Exchange Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…construction and fidelity of two-qubit gates (e.g. such as the controlled-NOT) from this Hamiltonian Fowler et al, 2003;Hill andGoan, 2003, 2004;Kerridge et al, 2006;Tsai et al, 2009;Tsai and Goan, 2008). From a microscopic physics viewpoint, in general the exchange energy J is stronger than the dipole interaction for smaller separations, however it behaves as (Herring and Flicker, 1964)…”
Section: Two-donor Systems and Exchange Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with atoms in traps the ground states are tightly confined and well isolated from the environment, giving rise to extraordinarily sharp transitions (3)(4)(5) and very long spin coherence times (6,7), measured with magnetic resonance experiments. There are several proposals for quantum information processing based on the spin of silicon donors (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) and such impurities can now be placed singly with atomic precision (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the pair of donors are at R A = 0, R B = R and R >> a * 0 (effective Bohr radius). The second sum (in square brackets) in equation (26) refers to the reciprocallattice expansion of the periodic Bloch functions, u ν ( r) = K c ν K e i K· r , and k ν , k µ are band minima points. The full expression for J νµ is given in the Appendix of [15]; in the isotropic effective-mass approximation where the envelope functions F n ( r) are the same for each minimum, and assuming that rapidly oscillating terms in the integrals (proportional to e i( k (i) − k (j) )· r , where r is one of the integrated variables) are negligible, J µν can be replaced by the exchange J w computed using the radial functions derived from the Whittaker functions.…”
Section: Inter-valley Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to find a solution to equation ( 5) that remains finite at the origin for a general given energy ǫ, we have to correct the potential at short distances. One way to do this is to look for corrections based on the local physics of the impurity (for example incorporating correctly the transition from a screened to an unscreened nuclear potential [24,25,26], or including self-consistently the scattering effects of the impurity by means of a pseudoptential based on the microscopic physics [27]); another way is to correct the potential at small r empirically solely in order to make the solution regular there at the experimentally observed energy eigenvalue. In this second case the potential will not correspond to the physics operating in the core region of the real defect, but it will produce the correct shift in binding energy.…”
Section: Model Central Cell Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%