2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dependent Schrödinger equation on arbitrary structured grids: Application to photoionization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out in [1], when the time differencing in Eq. (3) is carried out semi-implicitly, and the Coulomb gauge is employed, the discretized time advance operator,…”
Section: Semi-implicit Advance and Operator Splittingmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed out in [1], when the time differencing in Eq. (3) is carried out semi-implicitly, and the Coulomb gauge is employed, the discretized time advance operator,…”
Section: Semi-implicit Advance and Operator Splittingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In a previous article [1], we described an algorithm for solving the time dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE) in the Coulomb gauge, which strictly conserves probability on any structured grid with orthogonal basis vectors. The algorithm is particularly useful for simulating the photoionization of atoms, but can be applied equally well to any system where a non-relativistic electron is exposed to an arbitrary electromagnetic potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the second, "microscopic", regime the interaction of the field with a single atom or molecule is examined in the quantum mechanical picture. This in principle requires solution of the time dependent Schrodinger equation (TDSE) using approximate analytical methods [8], finite-difference time domain (FDTD) numerical solutions [9], or by Floquet expansion schemes [10]. Although attempts have been made to couple Maxwell's Equations with a "microscopic" Schrodinger model [11], these simulations are computationally expensive and remain largely beyond reach at the time of this writing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radius of the diagnostic sphere in all cases was 20 ground state radii (see Ref. 23 for a discussion of dependence on radius of diagnostic sphere).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%