2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2018.2841342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Domain Differential Protection Method Applied to Transmission Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The local protection methods, including time-overcurrent protection, device (recloser-fuse or relay) coordination protection [11], adaptive device coordination protection [12,13], adaptive distance protection [14], time-domain differential protection [15], are the currently mainstream and effective ones because they can provide rapid and reliable protection solution by using local information, especially for radial distribution system. However, these conventional local protection methods used in radial distribution systems, are prone to miscoordination in distribution system with DGs or in flexible distribution network (FDN) because of the change in the magnitude and direction of currents during the fault period [2].…”
Section: B Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local protection methods, including time-overcurrent protection, device (recloser-fuse or relay) coordination protection [11], adaptive device coordination protection [12,13], adaptive distance protection [14], time-domain differential protection [15], are the currently mainstream and effective ones because they can provide rapid and reliable protection solution by using local information, especially for radial distribution system. However, these conventional local protection methods used in radial distribution systems, are prone to miscoordination in distribution system with DGs or in flexible distribution network (FDN) because of the change in the magnitude and direction of currents during the fault period [2].…”
Section: B Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixing of negative and positive sequence currents in (8) and (9) has made another criterion. Next criterion value can be gained by mixing zero, negative and positive sequence currents in (10) and (11). 012s 2 p 2s 1g 0s 1s…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable from (8) and (9) that in the case of a symmetric fault or transformer inrush current, positive sequence current is decreased by a proper factor and negative sequence current contribution will get bold. Equations (10) and (11) are very similar to (8) and (9), except that they are combined with zero sequence current in order to improve the detection of ground faults. The block 3 outputs are considered as inputs for block 4 in Fig.…”
Section: The Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in the above distance or over-current backup protection, the stepped setting rules will result in ultra-long acting delay, usually 0.5s to 1.5s in practice, which seriously threatens the equipment even the system stability. Time-domain differential protection (TDP) method [18] is able to provide a secure and dependable solution with fast tripping. However, it is only applied to the primary protection of transmission lines.…”
Section: A Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%