2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time for interactive control systems in the public sector? The case of the Every Child Matters policy change in England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
42
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
42
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…While Simon's (1995) framework has been initially developed as a framework for intra-firm relationships, only recently it has also been applied for inter-firm relationships (Kominis and Dudau 2012;Rodrigue et al 2013). He identifies four systems of levers of control that are used to exercise control, naming them LOCs (levers of control): belief, boundary, diagnostic and interactive systems.…”
Section: Management Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Simon's (1995) framework has been initially developed as a framework for intra-firm relationships, only recently it has also been applied for inter-firm relationships (Kominis and Dudau 2012;Rodrigue et al 2013). He identifies four systems of levers of control that are used to exercise control, naming them LOCs (levers of control): belief, boundary, diagnostic and interactive systems.…”
Section: Management Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Governance affects interorganisational relations, e.g. conflicts between relational and bureaucratic governance brought lower expectations of supplier behaviour (Johansson and Siverbo, 2011); and vertical and horizontal controls in municipal joint ventures diminished trust, which impaired the realisation of economies of scale (Kominis and Dudau, 2012).…”
Section: Reconstituting the Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En la literatura se encuentran diferentes descripciones del uso interactivo de la información de control, como por ejemplo: se caracteriza por un alto nivel de participación de todos los miembros de la organización para examinar la actual estrategia y fomentar el diálogo para buscar nuevas líneas (Kominis y Dudau, 2012); se caracteriza por un diálogo activo y frecuente entre los directivos de la organización (Widener, 2007); representa un proceso de control que facilita la participación e interacción entre empleados de diferentes áreas de la organización (Abernethy y Brownell, 1999); se caracteriza por reuniones cara a cara entre los directivos y empleados de la organización (Mundy, 2010). Tessier y Otley (2012) señalan que esta diversidad de descripciones ha generado 2 problemas: por un lado, el concepto de uso interactivo sigue confuso en la literatura; por otro lado, los efectos del uso interactivo sobre el comportamiento y la motivación de los empleados siguen sin clarificarse (Bisbe et al, 2007).…”
Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified