2022
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2022.3179405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Frequency Fused Underwater Acoustic Source Localization Based on Contrastive Predictive Coding

Abstract: We propose a time-frequency fused underwater acoustic source localization method based on self-supervised learning with contrastive predictive coding. Firstly, two feature extractors are trained to solve the pretext task (predicting the future) based on the unlabeled acoustic signals in the time and frequency domains, respectively. Next, encoders with frozen parameters are taken from the trained feature extractors for extracting the high-level features in the time and frequency domains. During the training sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (30), w w w 1,k , w w w 2,k , w w w 3,k are process disturbances that account for uncertainty on pressure, pressure derivative, and source position, respectively. Such process disturbances can be used to account for different sources of uncertainty including parameter uncertainties, time and space discretization errors, etc..…”
Section: A Multiple Model Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (30), w w w 1,k , w w w 2,k , w w w 3,k are process disturbances that account for uncertainty on pressure, pressure derivative, and source position, respectively. Such process disturbances can be used to account for different sources of uncertainty including parameter uncertainties, time and space discretization errors, etc..…”
Section: A Multiple Model Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this paper builds on large-scale field estimation of discretized PDE systems [23], [24], and previous work on source identifiability and estimation in such systems [25], [26]. Further related work focused on USL for shallow-water environments and highfrequency signals using a multi-ray propagation model [27], decentralized detection in underwater sensor networks [28], decentralized USL via generalized likelihood ratio test [29], a self-supervised learning architecture that exploits joint timefrequency processing for USL [30], and acoustic source localization and tracking using a cluster of mobile agents [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal physics-based methods rely on basic characteristics, temporal features, and non-Gaussian characteristics of underwater acoustic signals (Yao X. et al, 2023). This includes time-domain features like zero-crossing distribution, frequency-domain features like cepstral analysis (Zhu et al, 2022), and joint time-frequency domain features such as wavelet transforms (Han et al, 2022;Tian et al, 2023). Brain-like computing features for underwater acoustic signals include Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) simulating nonlinear processing of the human ear (Di et al, 2023) and Gammatone filtering simulating peripheral auditory processing (Zhou et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the environment in which the experimental data of interest were collected, simulated data in similar environments produced using these software packages can be run for specific ranges and used as the basis for training a deep learning model. Other ranging methods have also been used such as classifying received signals into discrete range bins [103] or using recurrent architectures or more advanced representation learning methods such as contrastive learning [104].…”
Section: Range Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%