2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time in the Rock: A field guide to interpreting past events and processes from siliciclastic stratigraphy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variables that are considered in estimating the rate of deposition include record fidelity, complex and incomplete nature of stratigraphic record owing to changing dynamics of the depositional system, variation in rate of deposition for elements in the basin, time and length scales, and stochastic processes (“noise”) (Tipper, 2016; Davies et al, 2019; Holbrook and Miall, 2020; Straub et al, 2020). However, in long timescales, the rates of deposition are statistically buffered over periodicity (Straub et al, 2020) and cyclic variability sums produce the average rate of deposition, which can be plausibly estimated from measured parameters of sediment thickness over the time span of the section (Holbrook and Miall, 2020; Straub et al, 2020). The accuracy of average rates of deposition depends on the vertical thickness and longer durations of time (Holbrook and Miall, 2020).…”
Section: Geological Setting Stratigraphy and Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables that are considered in estimating the rate of deposition include record fidelity, complex and incomplete nature of stratigraphic record owing to changing dynamics of the depositional system, variation in rate of deposition for elements in the basin, time and length scales, and stochastic processes (“noise”) (Tipper, 2016; Davies et al, 2019; Holbrook and Miall, 2020; Straub et al, 2020). However, in long timescales, the rates of deposition are statistically buffered over periodicity (Straub et al, 2020) and cyclic variability sums produce the average rate of deposition, which can be plausibly estimated from measured parameters of sediment thickness over the time span of the section (Holbrook and Miall, 2020; Straub et al, 2020). The accuracy of average rates of deposition depends on the vertical thickness and longer durations of time (Holbrook and Miall, 2020).…”
Section: Geological Setting Stratigraphy and Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of strata and time will have either been lost to erosion, or preserved in outcrops as of yet undiscovered, or currently buried and not amenable to study. While we are only beginning to understand the chronostratigraphic exactness of sedimentary rock outcrops on Earth 53,55,56 , let alone Mars, it appears likely that the period of deposition in the northwestern rim of the Hellas basin exceeded 10 5 terrestrial years. Furthermore, the preservation of relatively intact channel margins and barforms advocates that throughout this protracted period fluvial deposition was a relatively constant phenomena 38 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a maximum of N = 4 levels (conceptually representing dunes, bars, channel‐belts, and basin‐scale topography), with dimensionless means of topographic relief of 0.25, 1, 3, and 8 (Figures 1a and 1c). While fluvial morphodynamic hierarchical elements are not limited to these classes alone, the vertical scales of topographic change span the entire spectrum expected in natural environments (Hajek & Straub, 2017; Holbrook & Miall, 2020; Miall, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%