2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-011-0664-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-of-flight sensor and color camera calibration for multi-view acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main cause of the noise in a depth image is a scene depth as analyzed in [13]. To simulate a depth image captured by a depth sensor, we firstly generate gaussian random value with Please note that our method shows more accurate results than RANSAC especially in case of the three-plane case.…”
Section: Synthetic Scenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main cause of the noise in a depth image is a scene depth as analyzed in [13]. To simulate a depth image captured by a depth sensor, we firstly generate gaussian random value with Please note that our method shows more accurate results than RANSAC especially in case of the three-plane case.…”
Section: Synthetic Scenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ToF camera provided depth information, and the RGB camera was used to obtain color information. Shim et al [14] presented a method to calibrate a multiple view acquisition system composed of ToF cameras and RGB color cameras. This system also has the ability to calibrate multi-modal sensors in real time.…”
Section: Poor Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of the studies simply used nominal values of IOPs provided by the sensor manufacturer in their system calibration procedures, without any correction [17]. Also, other studies did not consider some IOPs such as range distortion parameters ( [17,21,[24][25][26]) and focal length ( [3]) in their self-calibration procedures. To minimize the effect of the self-calibration quality on the accuracy of system calibration and also the quality of RGB-D data produced, the proposed study considers all the involved sensors and their IOPs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two or More Columns 2 8 cases (e.g., dataset 5, and 6) 4 cases (e.g., dataset 2, and 9) 3 5 cases (e.g., dataset 5, 6, and 7) 3 cases (e.g., dataset 2, 5, and 9) 4 2 cases (e.g., dataset 1, 2, 3, and 4) 7 cases (e.g., dataset 2, 3, 9, and 10) 5 -6 cases (e.g., dataset 2, 3, 5, 9, and 10) 6 -5 cases (e.g., dataset 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, and 10) 8 -3 cases (e.g., dataset 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, and 11) 9 -2 cases (e.g., dataset 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, and 11)…”
Section: Number Of Datasets Location Of Selected Datasets One Columnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation