1981
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0900069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Related Secretion of Gonadotrophins After a Single Injection of Steroid-Free Bovine Follicular Fluid in Prepubertal and Adult Female Rats

Abstract: The time-related changes in gonadotrophin concentrations after a single injection of steroid-free bovine follicular fluid (bFF), which contains material with inhibin-like activity, were studied in 25-day-old and adult female rats which either were intact or had been ovariectomized 2 days before. In ovariectomized and intact rats administration of bFF caused a selective suppression of FSH after 4--8 h in 25-day-old rats and after 3--4 h in adult rats. No systematic changes in concentrations of LH after bFF inje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
15
1

Year Published

1982
1982
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1B), and the enhancement or suppression of LH at one dose of pFF and GnRH in experiment 3 ( fig. 5C, F) are reminiscent of other occasional reports of LH enhancement or suppression with pFF in vivo [1,10,14,21,23,27], The lack of consistent findings, and the generally high dose of FF necessary to elicit LH changes, suggest that the LH effect is independent of the FSH effect. This impression is supported by in vitro studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1B), and the enhancement or suppression of LH at one dose of pFF and GnRH in experiment 3 ( fig. 5C, F) are reminiscent of other occasional reports of LH enhancement or suppression with pFF in vivo [1,10,14,21,23,27], The lack of consistent findings, and the generally high dose of FF necessary to elicit LH changes, suggest that the LH effect is independent of the FSH effect. This impression is supported by in vitro studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In vitro, FF does not alter luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion under basal conditions: however, when cultures are challenged with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), LH secre tion may be suppressed or enhanced [8,16]. Most in vivo studies with FF demonstrate highly specific FSH suppres sion, with no alteration of LH [2,15,17,20], However, occasional reports of LH suppression [ 10,23,27] or enhance ment [1,14,21] after FF injection in vivo have provided confusing evidence regarding the specificity of FSH supReceived: May 13,1983 Accepted after revision: August 11,1983 pression by such fluid. When they occur, these effects on LH in vivo appear to be associated with the highest doses of FF and with high endogenous GnRH secretion [12], We and others have proposed that the FSH suppressing factor in FF named 'folliculostatin' or 'ovarian inhibin', is a hormone of the ovary which provides the crucial negative feedback signal which selectively maintains FSH levels low in the presence of ovaries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that this efTect can be attributed to inhibin since the onset of the suppressive action of this hormone on FSH release has a relatively long latency, in the order of 3-4 h in vivo [20). This would account for the fact that a significant reduction in GnRH-induced FSH secretion in the presence of 50 ng inhibin/ml was only observed when the perifusing period was extended to 240 min ( fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study was undertaken to determine whether there is not only an initial suppression but also a later rebound of concentrations of FSH after a single injection of bFF in intact female rats on dioestrus-2, dioestrus-3, pro-oestrus and oestrus, thereby extending a previous study which used a similar treatment on dioestrus-1 (Hermans et al 1981). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These results could be due to levels of FSH after bFF injection insufficiently decreased to affect follicular development on different days of the cycle. Alternatively, this observation may be explained from the results of recent studies showing that after a single injection of porcine FF (pFF) on pro-oestrus (DePaolo, Hirshfield, Anderson, Barraclough & Channing, 1979) or of bFF on dioestrus-1 (= metoestrus) (Hermans, Debets, van Leeuwen & de Jong, 1981), initial suppression of levels of FSH is followed by a rebound, resulting in increases in plasma concentrations of FSH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%