“…For instance, the charge distribution in finite size systems (Yalcin et al ., 2012; Roy‐Gobeil et al ., 2015; Miyahara et al ., 2017), even in the presence of spatial, compositional and energy disorder (El Khoury, 2017), can be visualized by these techniques. Local electrostatic techniques provide information on the 2D spatial distribution of charge carriers in semiconductors (Chin et al ., 2008; Musumeci et al ., 2017), nanostructures (Krauss & Brus, 1999; Cherniavskaya et al ., 2003; Marchi et al ., 2008; Borgani et al ., 2016) and devices (Pingree et al ., 2009) and, more recently, in volume (3D) (Collins et al ., 2015; Fabregas & Gomila, 2020) and in time (Araki et al ., 2019; Borgani & Haviland, 2019; Mascaro et al ., 2019). These techniques were proven useful in studying the localization of trapped charges in thin films (Silveira & Marohn, 2004; Chen et al ., 2005a; Chen et al ., 2005b; Muller & Marohn, 2005), quantum dots (Tevaarwerk et al ., 2005) and nanotubes (Chin et al ., 2008); to measure the resistance at metal–semiconductor interfaces and grain boundaries in operating devices (Annibale et al ., 2007); to relate electrical properties, such as dielectric permittivity (Gramse et al ., 2009; El Khoury et al ., 2016; Fumagalli et al ., 2018), conductivity (Castellano‐Hernández & Sacha, 2015; Aurino et al ., 2016), piezoelectricity (Moon et al ., 2017) and percolation pathways (Barnes & Buratto, 2018), directly to the organization of the material at the mesoscopic length scales.…”