2019
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-019-0108-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-resolved electrostatic force microscopy using tip-synchronized charge generation with pulsed laser excitation

Abstract: Nanoscale observation of charge distribution and electric polarization is crucial for understanding and controlling functional materials and devices. In particular, the importance of charge dynamics is well recognized, and direct methods to observe charge generation, transfer, and recombination processes are required. Here, we describe tip-synchronized timeresolved electrostatic force microscopy. Numerical modeling clarifies that the tipsynchronized method provides temporal resolution with the timescale of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the charge distribution in finite size systems (Yalcin et al ., 2012; Roy‐Gobeil et al ., 2015; Miyahara et al ., 2017), even in the presence of spatial, compositional and energy disorder (El Khoury, 2017), can be visualized by these techniques. Local electrostatic techniques provide information on the 2D spatial distribution of charge carriers in semiconductors (Chin et al ., 2008; Musumeci et al ., 2017), nanostructures (Krauss & Brus, 1999; Cherniavskaya et al ., 2003; Marchi et al ., 2008; Borgani et al ., 2016) and devices (Pingree et al ., 2009) and, more recently, in volume (3D) (Collins et al ., 2015; Fabregas & Gomila, 2020) and in time (Araki et al ., 2019; Borgani & Haviland, 2019; Mascaro et al ., 2019). These techniques were proven useful in studying the localization of trapped charges in thin films (Silveira & Marohn, 2004; Chen et al ., 2005a; Chen et al ., 2005b; Muller & Marohn, 2005), quantum dots (Tevaarwerk et al ., 2005) and nanotubes (Chin et al ., 2008); to measure the resistance at metal–semiconductor interfaces and grain boundaries in operating devices (Annibale et al ., 2007); to relate electrical properties, such as dielectric permittivity (Gramse et al ., 2009; El Khoury et al ., 2016; Fumagalli et al ., 2018), conductivity (Castellano‐Hernández & Sacha, 2015; Aurino et al ., 2016), piezoelectricity (Moon et al ., 2017) and percolation pathways (Barnes & Buratto, 2018), directly to the organization of the material at the mesoscopic length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the charge distribution in finite size systems (Yalcin et al ., 2012; Roy‐Gobeil et al ., 2015; Miyahara et al ., 2017), even in the presence of spatial, compositional and energy disorder (El Khoury, 2017), can be visualized by these techniques. Local electrostatic techniques provide information on the 2D spatial distribution of charge carriers in semiconductors (Chin et al ., 2008; Musumeci et al ., 2017), nanostructures (Krauss & Brus, 1999; Cherniavskaya et al ., 2003; Marchi et al ., 2008; Borgani et al ., 2016) and devices (Pingree et al ., 2009) and, more recently, in volume (3D) (Collins et al ., 2015; Fabregas & Gomila, 2020) and in time (Araki et al ., 2019; Borgani & Haviland, 2019; Mascaro et al ., 2019). These techniques were proven useful in studying the localization of trapped charges in thin films (Silveira & Marohn, 2004; Chen et al ., 2005a; Chen et al ., 2005b; Muller & Marohn, 2005), quantum dots (Tevaarwerk et al ., 2005) and nanotubes (Chin et al ., 2008); to measure the resistance at metal–semiconductor interfaces and grain boundaries in operating devices (Annibale et al ., 2007); to relate electrical properties, such as dielectric permittivity (Gramse et al ., 2009; El Khoury et al ., 2016; Fumagalli et al ., 2018), conductivity (Castellano‐Hernández & Sacha, 2015; Aurino et al ., 2016), piezoelectricity (Moon et al ., 2017) and percolation pathways (Barnes & Buratto, 2018), directly to the organization of the material at the mesoscopic length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency shift was monitored using a phase-locked loop (PLL; OC4 station, Nanonis) to measure the attractive force resulting from the electrostatic interaction between the tip and sample. A detailed explanation of this combined amplitude modulation–frequency modulation mode has been described previously . The tr-EFM experiments were conducted under vacuum (<10 –2 Pa) at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a similar approach, Marohn and co-workers employed phase-kick EFM for time-resolved electrostatic force detection . Recently, we were able to obtain a video showing photoexcited carrier migration on an organic photovoltaic device with a time resolution of 0.3 μs and sensitivity of 0.3 Hz …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main motivations for OL KPFM is the full access to the raw data, uncorrected by any measurement procedure such as the feedback loop of a real-time operation. Moreover, the limited speed response of the feedback loop can also become a great impediment in observing ultrafast phenomena at time scale of the order of microseconds or less [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Open-loop Am-kpfm Measurements and Data Analysis In One-pass Pft Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the finite response time of the CL feedback (of the order of milliseconds in some cases) prevents the use of CL KPFM from observing fast electrodynamic processes. Some of these impediments are addressed in OL implementations such as time-resolved electrostatic force microscopy [29,30], pump-probe KPFM [31,32], or fast free force recovery KPFM [33] that are capable of observing the dynamics of the optoelectronic response of materials and electric field-induced charge migration at time scales of the order of tens of microseconds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%