Nonlocal gradient-corrected and hybrid density functional theory (DFT) have been used to calculate T1 potential
energy surfaces (PES), spin densities, and geometries of ethylene and aromatic olefins of various sizes: ethylene
(1), styrene (2), stilbene (3), 1,1-diphenylethylene (4), 1,4-bis-(1-propenyl)benzene (5), 1,3-divinylbenzene
(6), and 2-(1-propenyl)anthracene (7). Calculated properties were used to determine differences in electronic
structure of olefins that follow adiabatic vs diabatic Z/E-isomerization mechanisms. In the planar T1 structure,
the CC bond in 1 is elongated to a single bond, but in 7 it remains a double bond, archetypal of excitations
in the olefinic bond and in the substituent, respectively. Changes in geometries and spin-density distributions
of 2
−
7 reveal that substituent aromaticities vary along the T1 PES. For systems that isomerize diabatically
(e.g., 2), substituent aromaticity is regained in the 90° twisted structure of the CC bond (3p*). This leads
to stabilization and a minimum on the PES at 3p*. If the substituent of the planar T1 olefin fully can
accommodate the triplet biradical and still remain aromatic as in 7, aromaticity is instead reduced upon twist
to 3p*, so that the T1 PES has a barrier that is suitable for adiabatic isomerizations. The planar structures of
olefins with substituents that are partially antiaromatic in T1 (e.g., phenyl) can be stabilized by radical accepting
groups in the proper positions (e.g., 5). In summary, our calculations indicate that for an aryl-substituted
olefin the structure with the highest substituent aromaticity in T1 corresponds to the minimum on the T1 PES
of Z/E-isomerizations.