Time-saving effects using helicopter transportation: comparison to a ground transportation time predicted using a social navigation software

Abstract

BackgroundPrevious comparison studies regarding two types of transportation, helicopter (HEMS) versus ground emergency medical services (GEMS), have shown underlying heterogeneity as these options have completely different routes and consequent times with reference to one patient. To compare the two types of transportation on a case-by-case basis, we analyzed the retrospectively reviewed HEMS and predicted GEMS data using an open-source navigation software. MethodsPatients transferred by military HEMS from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. The HEMS records on the time of noti cation, injury point and destination addresses, and time required were reviewed. The GEMS data on distance and the predicted time required were acquired using open-source social navigation systems. Comparison analyses between the two types of transportation were conducted. Further, linear logistic regression analyses were performed on the distance and time of the two options. ResultsA total of 183 patients were enrolled. There was no statistical difference (p=0.3021) in the distance between the two types of transportation, and the HEMS time was signi cantly shorter than that of GEMS (61.31 vs. 116.92 minutes, p<0.001). The simple linear curves for HEMS and GEMS were separately secured, and two graphs presented the statistical signi cance (p) as well as reasonable goodness-of-t (R 2 ). In general, the HEMS graph demonstrates a more gradual slope and narrow distribution compared to that of GEMS. ConclusionIdeally, HEMS is identi ed as a better transportation modality because it has a shorter transportation time (56 minutes saved) and a low possibility of potential time delays (larger R 2 ). With a strict patient selection, HEMS can rescue injured or emergent patients who are "out of the golden hour."

Emergency Air Transport of Patients with Acute Chest Pain in the Adriatic Islands of Croatia: A Four-Year Analysis

“…HEMS is typically regarded as a better mode of transportation because of its reduced travel time and low risk of unexpected delays. One study demonstrated that HEMS transport saved 56 min when compared to ground medical transport services [ 18 ].…”

The Multiple Functions of Melatonin: Applications in the Military Setting

“…While there have been a number of significant advancements in handling these combat-related emergencies, which have improved the survival of severely injured individuals, there is always a need to further reduce the elapsed time from trauma to optimal treatment or to provide better on-site immediate care. Although the duration of the 'golden hour' does not always correlate with morbidity or mortality [82], the early transport of injured individuals to fully equipped medical facilities via helicopter emergency medical service (EMS), or another means, often improves survival [83]. At a minimum, for the severely injured combatant, it is psychologically reassuring to undergo treatment in an intensive care hospital setting as opposed to on the battlefield.…”

Resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims in Austria’s largest helicopter emergency medical service: A retrospective cohort study

“… 2 Since the 1960s, helicopters have been integrated into EMS systems to cover remote areas 3 and shorten transport times. 4 , 5 , 6 They provide specialized medical personnel and equipment to the emergency scene and are crucial for maintaining a high standard of care. 3 , 7 In Europe, Luxembourg, Switzerland and Austria are the countries with the highest density of rescue helicopters per population and area.…”