1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.47.1255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Scale of Fission at High Angular Momentum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[35,36] This correction, which is attributed to the presence of the nuclear medium, is sometimes characterized in terms of an effective nucleon mass m* ~ 0.5 m. [37] The resulting effective scattering cross section, a'lN = 0.5 iifV'N, determines the "classical" mean free path AO of the propagating nucleon (i. e. the mean free path if there were no blocking) or, equivalently, the "classical" collision rate Vo. This latter quantity is given by (4) Here p ~ 0.17 fm -3 is the nucleon density and g = 4 is the spin-isospin degeneracy.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Two-body Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35,36] This correction, which is attributed to the presence of the nuclear medium, is sometimes characterized in terms of an effective nucleon mass m* ~ 0.5 m. [37] The resulting effective scattering cross section, a'lN = 0.5 iifV'N, determines the "classical" mean free path AO of the propagating nucleon (i. e. the mean free path if there were no blocking) or, equivalently, the "classical" collision rate Vo. This latter quantity is given by (4) Here p ~ 0.17 fm -3 is the nucleon density and g = 4 is the spin-isospin degeneracy.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Two-body Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of the transition-state model of Bohr and Wheeler prevented this idea of Kramers to establish. Approximately forty years later, experimentally observed high pre-scission neutron multiplicities [11,12] gave the impetus to Grangé et al [13] to theoretically investigate the influence of dissipation on the fission time scale. Their numerical solution of the time-dependent FPE shows that it takes some time, the so-called transient time trans τ , until the current over the saddle point reaches its stationary value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data [1][2][3][4][5][6] for a highly excited (E* > 100 MeV) heavy (A > 100 amu) CN could not be explained by this standard analysis. In particular, neutron multiplicities have been found which are 2 to 3 times bigger than the ones predicted by the statistical model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This latter dependence was extensively analysed recently [9][10][11][12] as follows. Solving the Fokker-Planck equation one can define the time-dependent fission width F:(t) in terms of the probability flow over the saddle point [10] F:(t) = h 2:(0 = -h d in F(xo, t) (1) where F(x0, t) is the probability to find the system to the left of the saddle point Xo, that is inside the fission potential pocket. It takes some time before 2:(0 reaches the quasi-stationary value calculated by Kramers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%