Time to care? Health of informal older carers and time spent on health related activities: an Australian survey

Abstract

BackgroundLittle is known about the time spent on specific health related activities by older adult informal carers who assist people with chronic illness. Research has not yet addressed the association between carer health status and their care demands. Such information could inform policy and health system efforts to manage chronic illness.MethodsWe conducted an Australia wide survey using recall questionnaires to record time use. The study asked how much time is spent on “most days” for the most common activities like taking medication, self-treatment and testing, and how much time in the last month on less common activities like attending a physician or shopping associated with health needs. The survey was mailed to 5,000 members of National Seniors Australia; 2,500 registrants on the National Diabetes Services Scheme; and 3,100 members of the Australian Lung Foundation. A total of 2519 people responded, including 313 people who identified as informal carers. Statistical analysis was undertaken using Stata 11. Standard errors and confidence intervals were derived using bootstrapping techniques within Stata 11.ResultsMost carers (96.2%) had chronic illness themselves, and those with greater numbers of chronic illnesses were those who faced the greatest overall time demands. The top decile of carers devoted between 8.5 and 10 hours a day to personal and caring health related activities. Informal carers with chronic illness spent more time managing their own health than people with chronic illness who were not informal carers. These carers spent more time on caring for others than on caring for their own health. High levels of caring responsibility were associated with poorer reported carer health.ConclusionsPolicy and health care services will need to adapt to recognise and reduce the time burden on carers who themselves have chronic illness. More carefully targeted investment in the social infrastructure of formal care would free up carers for other activities (including their own care) and holds the potential to improve the quality of life as well as the health outcomes of this population.

Identifying Social Distress: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Social Outcomes 12 to 36 Months After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis

“…As the population ages, mutual caring will become commonplace and will need to be addressed. 21 Differences in sex were not seen in overall SD-16 scores, but subscale examination revealed men had more problems with money matters and women with self and others and, to a lesser extent, everyday living subscales, suggesting some traditional gender roles continue to prevail.…”

Care and caring: interdisciplinary perspectives on a societal issue of global significance

“…Evidence of how caring may be distributed across the life course, and how it may impact carers at different life stages, also been emerging (e.g. Smyth et al, 2011;Jowsey et al, 2013). Nevertheless precisely how the particular challenges of care in different circumstances affect carers remains relatively unexplored.…”

Time use by family caregivers of elderly with dementia: an integrative review

“…Informal caregivers with chronic diseases spend more time caring for their own health, compared to those not providing care, although they spend more time caring for the health of elderly than their own. This means that, to a certain extent, there is an incompatibility between the responsibilities for the care of an older family member and the maintenance of health by caregivers who are old and fragile (38) . In the care process, the compulsory replacement of activities and personal, work, social life and family life routines, over which caregivers had control and obtained benefits, for other activities determined by the care dynamics causes changes to their daily routine and perspective of personal time.…”

“…In the care process, the compulsory replacement of activities and personal, work, social life and family life routines, over which caregivers had control and obtained benefits, for other activities determined by the care dynamics causes changes to their daily routine and perspective of personal time. It is as if the time dedicated to care was a time subtracted from that previously available for caregivers or as if the sense of freedom of choice of caregivers was harmed (38) . To a great extent, the sense of burden and invasion of one's personal life experienced by family caregivers of elderly with severe physical and cognitive dependence can be attributed to such perceptions.…”