Developments in Time Series Analysis 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-4515-0_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time variable and state dependent modelling of non-stationary and nonlinear time series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it is unrealistic to simulate the discharge of these two catchments by simple conceptual models, the Data-Based Mechanistic (DBM) modelling approach proposed by Young and Beven (1994) has been tested. In this approach, the most parsimonious model structure is inferred statistically from the available time series, using the time variable parameter estimation method called Fixed Interval Smoothing (FIS) presented by Young (1984) and Young (1993). For the Aare and Jura catchments, the DBM modelling approach highlighted the predominating effect of the lagged runoff, resulting in an autoregressive model where the rainfall as driving forces is negligible.…”
Section: Hydrological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is unrealistic to simulate the discharge of these two catchments by simple conceptual models, the Data-Based Mechanistic (DBM) modelling approach proposed by Young and Beven (1994) has been tested. In this approach, the most parsimonious model structure is inferred statistically from the available time series, using the time variable parameter estimation method called Fixed Interval Smoothing (FIS) presented by Young (1984) and Young (1993). For the Aare and Jura catchments, the DBM modelling approach highlighted the predominating effect of the lagged runoff, resulting in an autoregressive model where the rainfall as driving forces is negligible.…”
Section: Hydrological Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirkby, 1976;Hornberger et al, 1985;Jakeman & Hornberger, 1993;Young, 1993Young, , 1998bYoung et al, 1997a,b;Ye et al, 1998) suggest that a typical set of rainfall-runoff observations contain only sufficient information to estimate up to a maximum of six parameters within simple, nonlinear dynamic models of dynamic order three or less. In the rainfall-runoff example discussed later, for instance, there is clear evidence in the data of only two dominant modes between the effective rainfall input and the flow response (as described by a second order transfer function model with only four parameters): a 'quick' mode with a residence time (time constant) of a few hours; and a 'slow' mode, with a residence time of many hours.…”
Section: Rainfall-flow Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the form of DBM models is concerned, the standard DBM modeling philosophy allows for any generic model type to be used in the initial data-based analysis. However, the main generic model form used so far is a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO), nonlinear differential equation or its discretetime equivalent, characterized by state-dependent parameter (SDP) nonlinearities [see e.g., Young, 1993Young, , 2001a. Here, the SDP model is one in which the model parameters are not assumed constant over the observation interval but, if the observational data support it, can be a priori unknown functions of one or more ''state variables'' of the system; functions that are identified and estimated as part of the statistical analysis.…”
Section: Dbm Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] Interestingly, one of the first applications that led to the idea of DBM modeling was to the modeling of rainfallflow processes [Young, 1974;Whitehead et al, 1976]; and this was generalized later in an example considered first in Young [1993] and then in Young and Beven [1994]. This led to numerous examples that have demonstrated the utility of DBM modeling applied to rainfall-flow processes [see e.g., Young, 1998;Lees, 2000;Young, 2001aYoung, , 2003Ratto et al, 2007;Chappell et al, 2006;Ochieng and Otieno, 2009;Young, 2010aYoung, , 2010bBeven et al, 2012;McIntyre et al, 2011, and references therein], including catchments affected by snow melt, where the nonlinearities are more complex .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%