2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005ja011291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time variations of cosmic ray electrons and nuclei between 1978 and 2004: Evidence for charge‐dependent modulation organized by changes in solar magnetic polarity and current sheet tilt

Abstract: [1] We have examined the 52-day average intensities of 1.2-GV electrons and positively charged nuclei of the same rigidity during the time period from 1978 to 2004. This time period covers a complete 22-year solar cycle plus data from 2000 to 2004 that can be used to examine the repetitive nature of the variations. The 11-year solar modulation changes both the electrons and nuclei intensities by similar overall factors $10 at 1.2 GV. Differences in the electron/nuclei modulation as exhibited by the e/nuclei ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rigidity P is calculated from the particle momentum p by P=pc|Z|e. It has been shown previously that ions with the same ratio ZeA like helium, carbon, or oxygen undergo the same temporal variation (e.g., Heber et al, ; Gieseler et al, ; McDonald et al, ; Webber et al, ). We take advantage of this and use IMP‐8 helium and ACE/CRIS carbon measurements as proxies for protons at the same rigidity.…”
Section: Observation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rigidity P is calculated from the particle momentum p by P=pc|Z|e. It has been shown previously that ions with the same ratio ZeA like helium, carbon, or oxygen undergo the same temporal variation (e.g., Heber et al, ; Gieseler et al, ; McDonald et al, ; Webber et al, ). We take advantage of this and use IMP‐8 helium and ACE/CRIS carbon measurements as proxies for protons at the same rigidity.…”
Section: Observation and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These drifts have long been known to have significant effects on cosmic-ray transport, and hence on cosmic-ray modulation (e.g Jokipii & Kopriva 1979;Jokipii & Thomas 1981), even in the heliosheath (Kota 2016). Drift effects account for the 22-year cycle observed in cosmic-ray intensities (Jokipii & Thomas 1981), lead to a strong dependence of observed cosmic-ray intensities on the solar tilt angle ) and heliospheric magnetic field polarity (Webber et al 2005), as well as having a significant influence on observed global cosmic-ray modulation phenomena such as observed latitude gradients (Heber et al 1996;Zhang 1997;de Simone et al 2011). Drift effects may even be of importance to the study of solar energetic particles (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient κ A is the drift coefficient and intervenes mostly for very energetic particles and strong gradients of the magnetic field (Jokipii and Levy, 1977). It takes into account the influence of the current sheet (Jokipii and Thomas, 1981), the solar tilt angle (Lockwood and Webber, 2005) and heliospheric magnetic field polarity (Webber et al, 2005). Drift effects also contribute to the 22-year cycle observed in the CR intensity and the CR latitudinal gradients (Heber et al, 1996).…”
Section: Diffusion Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%