2019
DOI: 10.1101/659508
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying nodal measures with temporal community structure: a cautionary note to avoid misinterpretation

Abstract: In network neuroscience, temporal network models have gained popularity. In these models, network properties have been related to cognition and behaviour. Here we demonstrate that calculating nodal properties that are dependent on temporal community structure (such as the participation coefficient) in time-varying contexts can potentially lead to misleading results. Specifically, with regards to the participation coefficient, increases in integration can be inferred when the opposite is occuring.Further, we pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From simulated rs-fMRI signal, timeresolved functional connectivity was computed using tapered sliding windows 15 . For each instance of time-resolved functional connectivity, three global network measures, mean participation coefficient (mean PC), mean temporal participation coefficient (mean TPC), and modularity, were calculated to track dynamic fluctuations between segregated and integrated patterns of functional connectivity 14,23,24,42 . The time series of mean PC, mean TPC, and modularity served as proxies of dynamic fluctuations between segregation and integration in the brain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From simulated rs-fMRI signal, timeresolved functional connectivity was computed using tapered sliding windows 15 . For each instance of time-resolved functional connectivity, three global network measures, mean participation coefficient (mean PC), mean temporal participation coefficient (mean TPC), and modularity, were calculated to track dynamic fluctuations between segregated and integrated patterns of functional connectivity 14,23,24,42 . The time series of mean PC, mean TPC, and modularity served as proxies of dynamic fluctuations between segregation and integration in the brain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study 42 proposed TPC by extending PC in Eq. (2) to improve its interpretability with time-varying community partitions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since neuromodulators have been reported to alter degree as well (see section changes of the global strength of intrinsic correlations ), future studies should carefully consider alterations in global degree when examining topological metrics. In addition, studies that have examined changes in the time-varying topology should take into account the influence of temporal fluctuations of the community structure on topological metrics (Thompson et al, 2019).…”
Section: Changes In Intrinsic Cortical Correlations Under Pharmacologmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant limitation might appear the calculation of the participation coefficient (P), as well as the within-module degree (z), which are related to the particular modular architecture used as a shaper 36 . Thus, our results are related to the modularity analysis found in our dataset.…”
Section: Comparison Of Positive and Negative Functional Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%