2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2008.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-varying ultimate strength of aging tanker deck plate considering corrosion effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By applying with frequencies presented in Figure 7 (related to a set of 570 measurements data of plate thickness due to corrosion), the positive p -values of this test is obtained only in the following two cases: a) the case of logistic distribution with mean 0.137133 and scale parameter 0.050494. Notice that the above logistic distribution coincides with those obtained in Subsection, 3.2 whose CDF is given by the expression (8).…”
Section: The Appropriate Statistical Data Related To Measurements On supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By applying with frequencies presented in Figure 7 (related to a set of 570 measurements data of plate thickness due to corrosion), the positive p -values of this test is obtained only in the following two cases: a) the case of logistic distribution with mean 0.137133 and scale parameter 0.050494. Notice that the above logistic distribution coincides with those obtained in Subsection, 3.2 whose CDF is given by the expression (8).…”
Section: The Appropriate Statistical Data Related To Measurements On supporting
confidence: 83%
“…In previous research, authors were motivated to investigate corrosion degradation of some specific structural members such as transversal bulkhead of bulk carriers [7] or deck plating of tankers [8,9,10,11], or all structural members (see Paik et al [4,12,13]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the condition of a ballast tank is not only agedependent but other important factors are involved such as substrate preparation, application conditions, mechanical damages, maintenance and many more. Moreover, when these observations are compared to other, previously published time dependent corrosion models [22][23][24][25][26][27][28], a similarly high variability can be noted for older ships.…”
Section: Exploitation Costmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…With a proper protection from corrosion, such a situation can be avoided, as presented in this investigation. Even for structural elements directly exposed to water flow, it has been shown that the breakdown of the coating, the most common type of corrosion protection system, takes between 2 and 10 years; see Guo et al [19]. The experiments showed that the efficient protection of ultimate strength can be achieved by several corrosion protection systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%