2006
DOI: 10.1080/13803390500205684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timed Gait Test: Normative Data for the Assessment of the AIDS Dementia Complex

Abstract: The Timed Gait test is a standardized procedure assessing motor dysfunction of lower extremities and gait abnormalities associated with AIDS dementia complex. Heretofore, interpretations of Timed Gait results have been hampered by the lack of normative data. We provide results on this test derived from 1,549 subjects (HIV-seronegatives (HIV-) and seropositives (HIV+) classified according to ADC stage). Timed Gait was found to be a useful screening and assessment tool for evaluating ADC and correlated with clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotion and facial recognition was measured with the (11) Ekman Faces test (Ekman, 1993) measuring recognition of six different emotions (sensitivity and specificity for the Ekman tests are good (eg, 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity in discriminating patients with frontotemporal dysfunction from healthy controls)) (Diehl-Schmid et al, 2007) and (12) Benton Facial Recognition Test (corrected long form scores) (Benton, 1990) that measured the ability to match faces. Motor function was measured by the (13) Timed Gait test (Robertson et al, 2006) (average time to walk a 12-foot floor-length back and forth for a total of three trials), with fine motor coordination assessed by the (14) Finger Tapping Test (the mean of the closest three out of five trials for each hand) (Reitan, 1985), a simple test of motor speed and motor control (tests of its sensitivity/specificity indicates that this test is a poor screening instrument but is useful as a diagnostic supplement) (Lezak, 1995), and (15) Grooved Pegboard Test (Ruff and Parker, 1993), a motor task including complex coordination (there is adequate sensitivity for this test in classifying brain damaged patients) (Lezak, 1995). All tests were presented in the same fixed order for all subjects.…”
Section: Np Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion and facial recognition was measured with the (11) Ekman Faces test (Ekman, 1993) measuring recognition of six different emotions (sensitivity and specificity for the Ekman tests are good (eg, 94% sensitivity and 100% specificity in discriminating patients with frontotemporal dysfunction from healthy controls)) (Diehl-Schmid et al, 2007) and (12) Benton Facial Recognition Test (corrected long form scores) (Benton, 1990) that measured the ability to match faces. Motor function was measured by the (13) Timed Gait test (Robertson et al, 2006) (average time to walk a 12-foot floor-length back and forth for a total of three trials), with fine motor coordination assessed by the (14) Finger Tapping Test (the mean of the closest three out of five trials for each hand) (Reitan, 1985), a simple test of motor speed and motor control (tests of its sensitivity/specificity indicates that this test is a poor screening instrument but is useful as a diagnostic supplement) (Lezak, 1995), and (15) Grooved Pegboard Test (Ruff and Parker, 1993), a motor task including complex coordination (there is adequate sensitivity for this test in classifying brain damaged patients) (Lezak, 1995). All tests were presented in the same fixed order for all subjects.…”
Section: Np Batterymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timed gait test is a useful measure of motor capacity in patients (Robertson et al, 2006) but is often affected by tissue injury at multiple sites within the nervous system during HIV infection, including peripheral nerve, spinal cord, or within the cerebellum or cerebrum. The present findings indicated that, although gait width was greater in FIV-infected animals, the variation in gait was a more robust gauge of disability and might in part reflect the outbred nature of the present host species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score represents the mean time of three trials, which is recorded in seconds and decimals. The mean and SD of the patients' scores were calculated for comparison with the IHDS performance (29) .…”
Section: Timed Gait Testmentioning
confidence: 99%