1995
DOI: 10.1109/43.365122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and area optimization for standard-cell VLSI circuit design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous approaches such as Sleepy Stack Technique [4], Input Vector Control (IVC) [6] and customised RTL designs [7] techniques have each had their individual drawbacks of high delay and area overheads, additional hardware units or low impact for deep sub-micron regimes (<20% power reduction). Automated sizing approaches using Linear Programming [8], Convex Optimization [9], Multi-Objective Optimization [10] and use of Lagrangian Relaxation [11] had all adopted gate sizing wherein all the transistors in a standard cell were scaled by the same factor. This top-down approach is highly circuit specific and the rise in number of variables for larger circuits makes the process highly complex.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous approaches such as Sleepy Stack Technique [4], Input Vector Control (IVC) [6] and customised RTL designs [7] techniques have each had their individual drawbacks of high delay and area overheads, additional hardware units or low impact for deep sub-micron regimes (<20% power reduction). Automated sizing approaches using Linear Programming [8], Convex Optimization [9], Multi-Objective Optimization [10] and use of Lagrangian Relaxation [11] had all adopted gate sizing wherein all the transistors in a standard cell were scaled by the same factor. This top-down approach is highly circuit specific and the rise in number of variables for larger circuits makes the process highly complex.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%