1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00336537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing and quantification of bone loss in cardiac transplant recipients

Abstract: To evaluate osteopenic bone disease in heart transplant patients, we prospectively measured bone mineral density (BMD) in 33 consecutive male recipients before hospital discharge and 1 year later, using dual photon absorptiometry. At hospital discharge BMD measurement at the lumbar spine was 90% of that expected in healthy age- and sex-matched controls (p = 0.005). One year later BMD had further decreased by 8.5% at the lumber spine and by 10.4% at the femoral neck (P = 0.0001). Five patients suffered vertebra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their incidence (18.2%) in the untreated group, in the first 2 years of follow-up, is similar to rates previously reported. 18,19,21,22 Although this study's small population precludes broader assertions, it is reasonable to suggest that prophylactic calcitonin administration could be most effective in the early period after cardiac transplantation, whereas extended administration does not seem to provide a benefit and could be discontinued.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Their incidence (18.2%) in the untreated group, in the first 2 years of follow-up, is similar to rates previously reported. 18,19,21,22 Although this study's small population precludes broader assertions, it is reasonable to suggest that prophylactic calcitonin administration could be most effective in the early period after cardiac transplantation, whereas extended administration does not seem to provide a benefit and could be discontinued.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Many patients already have a low bone mass at the time of the graft, due to cigarette smoking, prolonged physical inactivity, extensive use of loop diuretics and poor nutritional status [4]. In addition, bone mass decreases dramatically after the transplant, at trabecular sites as well as cortical sites [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This bone loss is explained by the relatively high doses of glucocorticoids given during the months following the graft, and by the negative effect of cyclosporin A, which probably increases bone turnover [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longitudinal studies have documented rates of bone loss ranging from 2.5% to 11%, predominantly during the first 3-12 months after transplantation (Table 56.4) [49,[156][157][158][159][160][161][162][163]. Bone loss at the hip is equal to or greater than bone loss at the LS [19,160].…”
Section: Bone Loss After Heart Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%