Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Physical Design - ISPD '03 2003
DOI: 10.1145/640015.640016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing driven force directed placement with physical net constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent paper, [12] reported an average T NS (total negative slack, which is a special case of our FOM when the slack threshold is zero) improvement of 47.6% and W NS improvement of 63.6%. Since we have no access to those test circuits in [12], we cannot make direct comparison with those numbers.…”
Section: Timing Driven Placementmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent paper, [12] reported an average T NS (total negative slack, which is a special case of our FOM when the slack threshold is zero) improvement of 47.6% and W NS improvement of 63.6%. Since we have no access to those test circuits in [12], we cannot make direct comparison with those numbers.…”
Section: Timing Driven Placementmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Table 2 and Table 3 compare the FOM and W NS results from ZW , W L, T S, and T SF. Since we can not compare directly with other timing driven placement algorithms due to the uniqueness of our flow, we report under the improvement columns for T S and T SF in these tables the optimization potential over W L relative to ZW , which is also used in [12]. The optimization potential is defined as the percentage of timing improvement by timing driven placement versus wire length driven placement, compared to an upper bound for such improvement.…”
Section: Timing Driven Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations