1989
DOI: 10.1097/00002341-198903000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of Silastic Tubing Removal After Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
4
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
34
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the success rate was slightly lower (73.3%) than in the previous studies, probably owing to the fact that success of nasolacrimal duct intubation reduces with increasing age. 17,18 In addition, in accordance with the previous studies, 17,18 we showed that the mean age of the patients with unsuccessful results was significantly higher than that of the patients with successful results. This may be caused by increased fibrosis at the site of obstruction in older children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our study, the success rate was slightly lower (73.3%) than in the previous studies, probably owing to the fact that success of nasolacrimal duct intubation reduces with increasing age. 17,18 In addition, in accordance with the previous studies, 17,18 we showed that the mean age of the patients with unsuccessful results was significantly higher than that of the patients with successful results. This may be caused by increased fibrosis at the site of obstruction in older children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction, the duration the silicone stent remains in the passage varies between 6 weeks and 6 months in the published reports [2,4,7,8,19]. In our study, because the average age was relatively high, we planned to leave the tube in for 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Welsh had 89.9% success with tube retention 43 months and 56% if o3 months. 18 In the study with no success, all tubes were lost by the third week. 17 We leave the tubes for at least 3 months but some patients had tubes for a longer duration because of failed appointments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%