1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(88)80113-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of specimen collection is crucial in urine screening of drug dependent mothers and newborns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methamphetamine use can be detected in hair, even after several years, if the section of the hair that grew during its use is still accessible 30. The possibility of measuring drugs in neonatal hair has made the detection of human fetal exposure to methamphetamine during gestation possible, a subject on which sparse information exists 3136.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methamphetamine use can be detected in hair, even after several years, if the section of the hair that grew during its use is still accessible 30. The possibility of measuring drugs in neonatal hair has made the detection of human fetal exposure to methamphetamine during gestation possible, a subject on which sparse information exists 3136.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, different biological specimens were used to confirm substance use in each cohort. Urine- and meconium-based tests have varying sensitivity, specificity, and windows of detection [4850]. Third, only 22% of women in SMARTT had meconium samples analyzed for substances, and some women in the static SMARTT cohort had long recall periods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At times, sufficient neonatal plasma can be difficult to collect, and other matrices, for example, urine, is preferred 25. Although less invasive, the drawback of urine collection is that drugs clear rapidly from urine, and so the time required for successful collection is critical 26. False negatives are therefore possible, and so a negative urine screen cannot definitely rule out maternal prenatal substance abuse 5.…”
Section: Clinical Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%