2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing of venous thromboembolic pharmacological prophylaxis in traumatic combined subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhage

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In patients with TBI, such as that in the present case, the early introduction of prophylaxis (≤48 hours) can minimise the risks of developing severe DVT without increasing haemorrhagic complications 6 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In patients with TBI, such as that in the present case, the early introduction of prophylaxis (≤48 hours) can minimise the risks of developing severe DVT without increasing haemorrhagic complications 6 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The American College of Surgeons state in its best practice guidelines for the management of TBI that in most cases, VTE prophylaxis should be considered within the first 72 h after TBI [ 28 ]. However, several recently published studies evaluated a more aggressive VTE prophylaxis in TBI patients and concluded that VTE prophylaxis within 48 h of admission is safe and effective in preventing VTE complications in TBI patients [ 29 33 ]. As a consequence of the increased VTE risk in penetrating as compared to blunt TBI an even more aggressive VTE prophylaxis might be appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, they are also at risk of intracranial bleeding or progression of intracranial haemorrhage. Several retrospective studies have shown that early pharmacological prophylaxis (< 48 h) is effective in reducing VTE without increasing the risk of intracranial haemorrhage in patients where progression of intracranial haemorrhage has been excluded 37–41 . In patients needing urgent neurosurgery (craniotomy, craniectomy or intracranial monitor or drain insertion), the probability of VTE increased with longer delays in pharmacological prophylaxis, but earlier prophylaxis was associated with a greater probability of repeated neurosurgery 42 .…”
Section: Traumatic Brain Injury/spinal Cord Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several retrospective studies have shown that early pharmacological prophylaxis (< 48 h) is effective in reducing VTE without increasing the risk of intracranial haemorrhage in patients where progression of intracranial haemorrhage has been excluded. [37][38][39][40][41] In patients needing urgent neurosurgery (craniotomy, craniectomy or intracranial monitor or drain insertion), the probability of VTE increased with longer delays in pharmacological prophylaxis, but earlier prophylaxis was associated with a greater probability of repeated neurosurgery. 42 Hence, the risk/benefit ratio of pharmacological prophylaxis is uncertain and needs individual assessment of VTE and intracranial bleeding risks.…”
Section: Traumatic Brain Injury/spinal Cord Injury Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%