2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing resolution improvement using DOI information in a four-layer scintillation detector for TOF-PET

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Unfortunately TOF and DOI precision are somewhat mutually exclusive, therefore whenever one improves the former, the latter worsens and vice versa. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In this paper, we show that the choice of a suitable treatment of the scintillator surfaces, along with suitable photodetectors and specific algorithms for raw data analysis, can allow to achieve an interesting tradeoff between detector element size, energy, time, and DOI resolution, thus strongly supporting the feasibility of a TOF-PET probe with the required features and performance. In numbers, we are going to show that a detector array whose individual elements are 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 10 mm in size, might achieve at the same time energy resolution around 11.5%, coincidence resolving time (CRT) below 300 ps and DOI resolution below 1 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…10 Unfortunately TOF and DOI precision are somewhat mutually exclusive, therefore whenever one improves the former, the latter worsens and vice versa. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In this paper, we show that the choice of a suitable treatment of the scintillator surfaces, along with suitable photodetectors and specific algorithms for raw data analysis, can allow to achieve an interesting tradeoff between detector element size, energy, time, and DOI resolution, thus strongly supporting the feasibility of a TOF-PET probe with the required features and performance. In numbers, we are going to show that a detector array whose individual elements are 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 10 mm in size, might achieve at the same time energy resolution around 11.5%, coincidence resolving time (CRT) below 300 ps and DOI resolution below 1 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The increased scatter and longer transport lead to more light attenuation, which causes the photo-peak in the energy spectrum to decrease as the distance between the DOI position and the PMT surface increases (figure 5(b)). In addition, the time walk between the 2 and 18 mm DOI positions was estimated to be relatively longer (340 ps) than when polished crystals were used (100-200 ps) (Shibuya et al 2008, Vinke et al 2010, Spanoudaki and Levin 2011. This time walk information as a function of DOI position can be utilized for elevating the timing performance of this detector at the system level as the time resolution at each DOI position ranges from 320 to 356 ps (Ito et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A PET system using long crystals will also have an increased parallax error, leading to a radial degradation in image spatial resolution. Therefore, detector designs based on LaBr 3 /CeBr 3 can potentially benefit more by including techniques to measure DOI, as this information can be used to correct for timing uncertainties caused by the use of longer length crystals (Shibuya et al 2008, Spanoudaki and Levin 2011), as well as reduce parallax error in the reconstructed images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%