2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.26.356154
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing variability and midfrontal ~4 Hz rhythms correlate with cognition in Parkinson’s disease

Abstract: Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) can have significant cognitive dysfunction; however, the mechanism of these cognitive symptoms are unknown. Here, we used scalp electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate the cortical basis for PD-related cognitive impairments during interval timing, which requires participants to estimate temporal intervals of several seconds. Time estimation is an ideal task demand for investigating cognition in PD because it is simple, requires medial frontal cortical areas, and recru… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(127 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is that we cannot dissociate MSN subtypes that express D1 vs. D2 dopamine receptors, and we are uncertain how the powerful neuromodulator dopamine affects striatal networks (Cui et al , 2013). Second, we cannot fully dissociate ramping activity from movements, which would require alternative task designs (Church & Deluty, 1977), although one critical advantage of our task design is that it readily translates to humans (Ward et al , 2011; Kim et al , 2017; Parker et al , 2017), particularly with Parkinson’s disease (Singh et al , 2021). Third, with our approach, we were unable to identify oscillatory or state-based coding schemes in the striatum that change with experience, although our analytical approach may not be suited to identify these network properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first is that we cannot dissociate MSN subtypes that express D1 vs. D2 dopamine receptors, and we are uncertain how the powerful neuromodulator dopamine affects striatal networks (Cui et al , 2013). Second, we cannot fully dissociate ramping activity from movements, which would require alternative task designs (Church & Deluty, 1977), although one critical advantage of our task design is that it readily translates to humans (Ward et al , 2011; Kim et al , 2017; Parker et al , 2017), particularly with Parkinson’s disease (Singh et al , 2021). Third, with our approach, we were unable to identify oscillatory or state-based coding schemes in the striatum that change with experience, although our analytical approach may not be suited to identify these network properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisely guiding movements in time is critical for human behaviors, such as cooking, driving, and crossing the street (Buhusi & Meck, 2005). Temporal control of action is disrupted in diseases such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and schizophrenia (Ward et al , 2011; Parker et al , 2013; Singh et al , 2021). A brain structure that is affected by both diseases and is key for controlling movements in time is the dorsal striatum (Matell & Meck, 2004; Meck, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steps defined the width (or 'cycles') of each frequency band, increasing from three to ten cycles, between 1 and 50 Hz, and taking the inverse FFT (Singh et al, 2021;Singh et al, 2018).…”
Section: Lfp Recordings and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power was normalized by converting the spectral amplitude to a decibel (dB) scale using the formula 10 * 10 ( / ), allowing us to compare the effects across frequency bands directly. As in our previous work, the baseline for each frequency was calculated by averaging power from −300 to −200 ms before the onset of the stimulus/response (Singh et al, 2020;Singh et al, 2021;Singh et al, 2018). Afterward, epochs were segmented from -500 to +1000 ms.…”
Section: Lfp Recordings and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation