Static Timing Analysis for Nanometer Designs 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-93820-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timing Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on either a breadth-first search or depth-first search, path enumeration algorithms have been proposed in [6,7]. Although these algorithms provide more information than the critical path algorithms, they suffer from the path explosion problem.…”
Section: K-most Critical Paths Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on either a breadth-first search or depth-first search, path enumeration algorithms have been proposed in [6,7]. Although these algorithms provide more information than the critical path algorithms, they suffer from the path explosion problem.…”
Section: K-most Critical Paths Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking process variations into account in timing analysis requires more computational effort. Multi-corner multi-mode static timing analysis (MCMM STA) is another variationaware approach to timing analysis that can serve as a compromise between traditional STA [7] and statistical static timing analysis (SSTA) [8]. In timing analysis, MCMM STA is very efficient in a sense that it propagates only minimum and maximum delay values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides balancing skews, CTS also needs to balance the critical path delays of the enable signal to the CGCs along with the clock latency. To report timing paths across clocks accurately, we set the path multiplier in the Synopsys Design Constraint (SDC) [3] file for paths between all clocks. Table 3 summarizes the key metrics of the clock tree before (I = Initial, produced by a commercial tool) and after (O = Optimized) applying our top-level clock tree optimization.…”
Section: Testcase Description and Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We perform hierarchical synthesis at 45nm and flat synthesis at 28nm to demonstrate the scalability of GTX across different flows and foundry technologies. We generate verilog netlists, Synopsys Design Constraints (SDC) [1], and Standard Parasitic Exchange Format (SPEF) [40] files as inputs to timing tools. Real-world designs.…”
Section: A Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methodology is properly considered to be deep learning-based because the models in GTX are hierarchical, e.g., the output of the cell and wire delay models are input to the stage delay model [12]. Our modeling goals for each model are to (1) minimize the sum of squared errors, and (2) minimize the maximum range of errors. We achieve:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%