“…Therefore, the photoexcited e − during the delivery process to surface water molecules compete against the electron‐hole recombination, and thus, from the combination of electronic and kinetic factors, the H 2 production rates are found sluggish [25,26] . To aid the synthesis of more performant TiO 2 catalysts, without relying for improvements on the additional use of other metal/s as co‐catalyst or with the addition in the water solution of hole scavengers (e. g., MeOH, ethanol, glycerol as electron donor agents), it is pivotal to achieve deeper understanding of the nature of the photogenerated active species that are active in H + catalysis, to reveal their spatial distribution, time evolution, and to dissect the electronic/structural factors affecting their stabilities and the e − /h + recombination proclivity [27–37] . In our previous work, we reported synthesis and photocatalytic H 2 evolution rates from MeOH/water mixture of a series of anatase nano‐powders, which were thermally treated under various conditions (air, Ar, ArH 2 , and pure H 2 atmosphere) and at different temperatures (300, 500, 700, 900 °C) [38] .…”