1993
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199308000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Expansion in the Pediatric Patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1976, Radovan used the tissue expander concept for reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy. Subsequently, the use of tissue expansion has been popularized among plastic surgeons and has become the treatment method of choice for many congenital and acquired defects in children and adults [1][2][3] . Expanders are silicone envelopes that have self-sealing injection ports ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1976, Radovan used the tissue expander concept for reconstruction of the breast after mastectomy. Subsequently, the use of tissue expansion has been popularized among plastic surgeons and has become the treatment method of choice for many congenital and acquired defects in children and adults [1][2][3] . Expanders are silicone envelopes that have self-sealing injection ports ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the risk of malignant disease is lower than previously reported, and that even after surgical treatment the risk does not disappear, especially in those children with a central nervous system component, we believe that it is appropriate to view the removal of the majority of the GCN as a reconstructive aesthetic surgical procedure rather than prophylactic cancer surgery (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The advent of tissue expansion has increased the ability to remove a large portion of the GCN while offering a reasonable functional and aesthetic result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevus cells could also, on occasion, be found after surgery at the skin closure sites or gradually migrating into the surface skin grafts (8,9). If the risk is much lower than reported previously, and the real chances of completely eradicating the risk is impossible, we believe it is therefore appropriate to say that GCN removal is first a reconstructive and aesthetic surgical procedure rather than prophylactic cancer surgery (10)(11)(12). This should highlight that it is no longer necessary or often appropriate to remove such lesions and leave significant functional impairment and cosmetic disfigurement (1,2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations