2010
DOI: 10.1118/1.3352686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue-mimicking bladder wall phantoms for evaluating acoustic radiation force-optical coherence elastography systems

Abstract: A material that mimics the mechanical, optical, and acoustic properties of healthy bladder wall has been developed. This tissue-mimicking bladder wall phantom was developed as a control tool to investigate the feasibility of using ARF-OCE to detect the mechanical and optical changes that may be indicative of the onset or development of cancer in the urinary bladder. By following the methods used in this article, phantoms matching the optical, acoustic, and mechanical properties of other biological tissues can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3(a) shows the effect of contrast between the layers ranging from 0.5 mm −1 to 3 mm −1 . These values reflect the range of attenuation coefficients that are reasonable to detect using OCT [34] and that can be seen in actual tissue; for example, the three layers of the bladder visible with OCT have attenuation coefficients of approximately 0.49 mm −1 , 2 mm −1 , and 1.38 mm −1 [35]. For all simulations, the attenuation coefficient of the top layer was fixed at 1 mm −1 , the focal plane was located at a depth of 0.5 mm, and the layer thicknesses were all 1 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(a) shows the effect of contrast between the layers ranging from 0.5 mm −1 to 3 mm −1 . These values reflect the range of attenuation coefficients that are reasonable to detect using OCT [34] and that can be seen in actual tissue; for example, the three layers of the bladder visible with OCT have attenuation coefficients of approximately 0.49 mm −1 , 2 mm −1 , and 1.38 mm −1 [35]. For all simulations, the attenuation coefficient of the top layer was fixed at 1 mm −1 , the focal plane was located at a depth of 0.5 mm, and the layer thicknesses were all 1 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attenuation coefficient α 1 of 1% BSA is ∼0.02 dB cm −1 MHz −1 and increases linearly with concentration. 31,32 Here we added 35% lyophilized BSA (≥95% purity, Roche Diagnostics, USA), which was expected to raise α 1 in the dermis layer from ∼0.5 to ∼1.1 dB cm −1 MHz −1 . Similarly, 15% BSA was added to the hypodermis layer to raise α 1 from ∼0.3 to ∼0.6 dB cm −1 MHz −1 .…”
Section: C1 Controlling Acoustic Attenuation and Backscatter In Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure was implemented using an algorithm implemented in MATLAB (The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). The algorithm has already been successfully used to adequately characterize the optical properties of bladder-wall phantoms [9,10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%