2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tissue Response to Surgical Energy Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
65
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
65
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, Phillips et al [22] tested the tissue response to surgical energy devices in a porcine model. A fullthickness lateral energy spread caused by BP compared with that caused by UC was statistically higher in the arteries (4.5 vs. 0.6 mm) and the veins (5.5 vs. 1.5 mm) for each sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, Phillips et al [22] tested the tissue response to surgical energy devices in a porcine model. A fullthickness lateral energy spread caused by BP compared with that caused by UC was statistically higher in the arteries (4.5 vs. 0.6 mm) and the veins (5.5 vs. 1.5 mm) for each sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With greater pressure, there is more cutting but less tissue coagulation. Ultrasonic devices produce less heat than electrosurgery [16,17,38,48,49], and can be used to coagulate tissue, and are documented to divide blood vessels up to 5mm [39]. e mechanism of tissue temperature rise is di erent to electrosurgery.…”
Section: Ultrasonic Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative technique for surgical dissection is ultrasonic dissection (UD) which uses mechanical energy from vibrations at 55 kHz that disrupt the hydrogen bonds in tissue proteins and leads to division of the tissue. ere are con icting results according collateral thermal spread from EBDs, some have conlcuded a reduced propensity to cause collateral thermal damage in UD [15,16] [17] compared to ES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Ultrasonic-based devices have been shown to produce less thermal spread than RF devices. 14,15 However, the active jaw of ultrasonic devices can reach temperatures in excess of 200°C (Refs. 15 and 16) and take >20 s to cool to usable temperatures.…”
Section: Energy-based Surgical Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Although RF devices are associated with larger thermal spread, their jaw temperatures are lower (<100°C) than ultrasonic devices. 15,16 These energy-based devices expedite normally labor-intensive surgical procedures, such as lobectomy, 18 nephrectomy, gastric bypass, 19 splenectomy, 20 thyroidectomy, 21 hysterectomy, 22 and colectomy. 23 However, both electrosurgical and ultrasonic devices have limitations, including the potential for undesirable charring and unnecessarily large collateral thermal damage zones (Table 1). 14,24,25…”
Section: Energy-based Surgical Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%