1999
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-996875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Titan-Prothesen im Mittelohr

Abstract: The superior acoustic properties of the delicate yet rigid low-weight titanium implants combined with excellent biocompatibility lead to a good hearing result if a meticulous surgical technique is employed. The easy handling makes it a pleasure to work with these protheses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
1
6

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Extrusion rates in our study were comparable to those of Ho et al [13] (4%) and of Begall et al [10] (4.4%). Rates of revision surgery were higher compared to other studies by Stupp et al [11] (5.6%), Martin and Harner [15] (7%) and Gardner et al [14] (6%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extrusion rates in our study were comparable to those of Ho et al [13] (4%) and of Begall et al [10] (4.4%). Rates of revision surgery were higher compared to other studies by Stupp et al [11] (5.6%), Martin and Harner [15] (7%) and Gardner et al [14] (6%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…A study done by Stupp et al [11,12] found a success rate of 76%, studies by Ho et al [13] and Gardner et al [14] have reported success rate of 56% (64% for PORP and 45% for TORP) and 71% for PORP and 44% for TORP respectively. In the present study success was considered after attaining dry ear and with a postoperative improvement of an Air Bone Gap of 20 dB or less and our success rate was 76.47% (75% for PORP and 77.77% for TORP).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nowadays, in some ear specialists' opinion, long-term follow-ups may even reach up to 20% of extrusion-related failures. Recently, both hydroxylapatite (HA), due to its chemical similarity to the mineral phase of the osseous tissue (Grote et al 1981;Grote 1986;Wehrs 1995;Goldenberg and Driver 2000;Rondini-Gilli et al 2003) and, more recently, titanium (Ti) (Stupp et al 1999;Zenner et al 2001;Ho et al 2003;Gardner et al 2004;Martin and Harner 2004), due to its processability in minute shape and its success as bone substitute, are the most commonly used biomaterials for ossicular prostheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Vielzahl der verschiedenen Designvorschläge zeigt, dass die ideale Prothese bisher nicht gefun− den wurde. Bei weniger als 3/4 der Patienten ge− lingt es mithilfe dieser Rekonstruktionen, die postoperativ verbleibende Schallleitungskompo− nente auf 20 dB oder weniger zu reduzieren [5]. Ungeachtet …”
unclassified