2016
DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2016.00078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TMSEEG: A MATLAB-Based Graphical User Interface for Processing Electrophysiological Signals during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Abstract: Concurrent recording of electroencephalography (EEG) during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an emerging and powerful tool for studying brain health and function. Despite a growing interest in adaptation of TMS-EEG across neuroscience disciplines, its widespread utility is limited by signal processing challenges. These challenges arise due to the nature of TMS and the sensitivity of EEG to artifacts that often mask TMS-evoked potentials (TEP)s. With an increase in the complexity of data processing me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The workflow of ARTIST is similar to the one described in TESA (Rogasch et al, 2016) and TMSEEG (Atluri et al, ), but unlike those other packages, here the IC rejection is fully automated. In particular, a semi‐automated algorithm for IC selection was provided in TESA, in which the ICs were classified based on heuristically defined thresholds, as opposed to the thresholds determined in a data‐driven manner as in ARTIST, and the IC classification accuracy was not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The workflow of ARTIST is similar to the one described in TESA (Rogasch et al, 2016) and TMSEEG (Atluri et al, ), but unlike those other packages, here the IC rejection is fully automated. In particular, a semi‐automated algorithm for IC selection was provided in TESA, in which the ICs were classified based on heuristically defined thresholds, as opposed to the thresholds determined in a data‐driven manner as in ARTIST, and the IC classification accuracy was not reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As spTMS-EEG data are considered noisier than standard EEG data due to stimulation-induced artifacts, various additional methods were developed (Atluri et al, 2016;Casula et al, 2017;Hernandez-Pavon et al, 2012;Herring, Thut, Jensen, & Bergmann, 2015;Korhonen et al, 2011;Mutanen et al, 2016;Rogasch et al, 2014Rogasch et al, , 2016. In general, these methods used signal projection techniques to find spatial filters that could suppress the artifacts while leaving the neural signals largely intact.…”
Section: Review Of Current Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, TEP analysis has several steps such as filtering, noise reduction and independent component analysis. While, we followed the steps for a previously established TEP analysis pipeline (13,34), each step has a number of assumptions that manipulates the data. While the underlying process may be the same, the difference in the approaches may alter the output and in effect 'hide' the effects of cortical inhibition from TEP analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoping to improve and standardize analysis across the field of TMS-EEG research, Rogasch et al (2017) released the TMS-EEG signal analyzer (TESA), an open-source extension for EEGLAB that includes functions that are specific for TMS-EEG analysis. Other open source toolboxes include TMSEEG (Atluri et al, 2016) and code within the FieldTrip toolbox (see Herring, Thut, Jensen, & Bergmann, 2015).…”
Section: Technological and Computational Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%