2013
DOI: 10.1093/analys/ant093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To be fair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discuss Broome’s (1990) account of fair division and a theory of fairness proposed by Curtis (2014). We suggest that the only way in which they can avoid the criticism of Hooker (2005) is by remaining silent on a number of important fair division problems, which is undesirable.…”
Section: Philosophical Theories Of Fairness and Hooker’s Objectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We discuss Broome’s (1990) account of fair division and a theory of fairness proposed by Curtis (2014). We suggest that the only way in which they can avoid the criticism of Hooker (2005) is by remaining silent on a number of important fair division problems, which is undesirable.…”
Section: Philosophical Theories Of Fairness and Hooker’s Objectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for cases that involve multiple indivisible goods, Broome’s theory does not tell us how, in order to be fair, we must divide the amount of available good. More generally, Curtis (2014: 47) argues that Broome has not ‘laid down a theory of precisely what one must do in order to be fair’. Curtis (2014) does not leave it at this remark but has ventured to develop Broome’s account into a more precise theory of fairness, as discussed in the next section.…”
Section: Philosophical Theories Of Fairness and Hooker’s Objectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We introduce the claims approach and the games approach to fair division and explain that both approaches can be used to model fair division problems such as Problem I and II. Ever since Broome's seminal paper on fairness (Broome 1990), fair division problems are modelled as claims problems in the philosophical literature (see Hooker 2005;Saunders 2010;Tomlin 2012;Curtis 2014or Piller 2017 for an overview). However, by drawing on O'Neill (1982), we observe that the very same fair division problems can also be modelled as cooperative games.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broome is thus quite non-committal about the notion of proportionality, and his theory does not offer an actual method that describes 'how to be fair'. In response to this, Curtis (2014) has provided a new theory of fairness that spells out what he maintains Broome's (1990) theory has left out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%