2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To cut or not to cut? Assessing the modular structure of brain networks

Abstract: A wealth of methods has been developed to identify natural divisions of brain networks into groups or modules, with one of the most prominent being modularity. Compared with the popularity of methods to detect community structure, only a few methods exist to statistically control for spurious modules, relying almost exclusively on resampling techniques. It is well known that even random networks can exhibit high modularity because of incidental concentration of edges, even though they have no underlying organi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To reach some standard of replicability, researchers have instead come to rely on permuting the algorithm for the maximum Q, or modularity quotient. We have therefore sought to employ a more robust modularity algorithm [Chang et al, ] that relies on a transformed Tracy‐Widom distribution to more adequately model the null distribution in a modularity computation. Furthermore, while it is possible to estimate modularity within individuals [e.g., Simpson et al, ], modularity based on an average are naturally consistent across subjects, and widely used [Hagmann et al, ; Lim et al, ].…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reach some standard of replicability, researchers have instead come to rely on permuting the algorithm for the maximum Q, or modularity quotient. We have therefore sought to employ a more robust modularity algorithm [Chang et al, ] that relies on a transformed Tracy‐Widom distribution to more adequately model the null distribution in a modularity computation. Furthermore, while it is possible to estimate modularity within individuals [e.g., Simpson et al, ], modularity based on an average are naturally consistent across subjects, and widely used [Hagmann et al, ; Lim et al, ].…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reach some standard of replicability, researchers have instead come to rely on permuting the algorithm for the maximum , or modularity quotient. We have therefore sought to employ a more robust modularity algorithm (Chang et al, 2014) that relies on a transformed Tracy-Widom distribution in order to more adequately model the null distribution in a modularity computation. Furthermore, while it is possible to estimate modularity within individuals (e.g., Simpson et al, 2012), modularity based on an average are naturally consistent across subjects, and widely used (Hagmann et al, 2008;Lim et al, 2015).…”
Section: Modularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed Empirical Bayes method brings together both the frequentist and Bayesian approaches, in the sense that we can report and control the estimated local FDR at each test, which is defined as the posterior probability that a test belongs to null group, and controlling it. The locFDR approach is readily applicable to the other available methods for measuring synchrony, e.g., mutual information, generalized synchronization [ 42 ], single-trial phase locking [ 43 ], structural synchrony [ 13 ], empirical mode detection PLV [ 44 ], phase resetting [ 45 , 46 ], a method based on Cohens class of time-frequency distributions [ 47 ], and a recently published graph partitioning method for modeling brain connectivity [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%