2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To detect or not to detect: A replication and extension of the three-stage model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of the aforementioned variables can be thought of as indicators of the propensity to recognize when one's intuitive thinking may be insufficient and more effortful processing is needed (Frederick, 2005;Stanovich et al, 2016), which might explain their contribution to one's conflict detection ability. Also, in line with Swan et al (2018;however see Thompson & Johnson, 2014), we have observed a weak correlation between cognitive ability and the confidence and latency detection efficiencies, but this relationship did not hold in the regression where other predictors were taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both of the aforementioned variables can be thought of as indicators of the propensity to recognize when one's intuitive thinking may be insufficient and more effortful processing is needed (Frederick, 2005;Stanovich et al, 2016), which might explain their contribution to one's conflict detection ability. Also, in line with Swan et al (2018;however see Thompson & Johnson, 2014), we have observed a weak correlation between cognitive ability and the confidence and latency detection efficiencies, but this relationship did not hold in the regression where other predictors were taken into account.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Moreover, this figure has been mostly obtained in studies with educated adults, therefore, one might expect that in the general population detection failures could be yet more prevalent. While there now seems ample evidence for substantial individual differences in conflict detection (Frey et al, 2018;Mata et al, 2017;Mevel et al, 2014;Pennycook et al, 2015;Swan et al, 2018), there is very little empirical research available that allows us to identify individual predictors related to the efficiency of this ability.…”
Section: Conflict Version No-conflict Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies generally show that people spend more time solving a conflict task in comparison with its no-conflict counterpart (e.g. Pennycook, Fugelsang & Koehler, 2012;Johnson, Tubau, & De Neys, 2016), although this prolonged time failed to result in higher accuracy in several recent studies (Swan, Calvillo and Revlin, 2018;Šrol & De Neys, 2019;Teovanović, 2019). Taken together, the confidence and response time differences between the conflict and no-conflict task, as well as simple response time that one takes to complete the reasoning task could be taken as indicators of conflict detection.…”
Section: Conflict Detection Studies: Methodology and Critical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In sum, these additional criticisms suggest that type-based interpretations DPT may obscure rather than clarify the idea that human reasoning and decision making is inherently dualistic. Part of the reason for this is that many of the same reasoning processes can be also described by a 'one-system' model (Osman 2004;Kruglanski and Gigerenzer 2011) or, as I mentioned above, models with many systems and stages (Stanovich 2011;Varga and Hamburger 2014;Pennycook et al 2015;Swan et al 2018). This can be seen as a further justification for the claim that rational decisionmaking cannot be reduced to the operations of single system, or in this instance, a single type: Type 2 processes, like System 2 processes, do not guarantee rational decision-making, and likewise, Type 1 processes, like System 1 processes, do not necessarily produce irrational actions.…”
Section: Why the Type 1 / Type 2 Distinction Doesn't Escape Criticismmentioning
confidence: 99%