To Which World Regions Does the Valence-Dominance Model of Social Perception Apply? [ Registered Report Stage 1 - Protocol]

Jones, Benedict C.; DeBruine, Lisa; Liuzza, Marco Tullio; Antfolk, Jan; Arinze, Nwadiogo Chisom; Ndukaihe, Izuchukwu L.G.; Bloxsom, Nicholas G.; Lewis, Savannah; Foroni, Francesco; Willis, Megan L.; Cubillas, Carmelo P.; Vadillo, Miguel A.; Turiégano, Enrique; Gilead, Michael; Simchon, Almog; Sarıbay, S. Adil; Owsley, Nicholas; Jang, Chaning; Mburu, Georgina; Calvillo, Dustin P.; Włodarczyk, Anna; Qi, Yue; Ariyabuddhiphongs, Kris; Jarukasemthawee, Somboon; Manley, Harry; Suavansri, Panita; Taephant, Nattasuda; Stolier, Ryan M.; Evans, Thomas Rhys; Bonick, Judson; Lindemans, Jan; Ashworth, Logan F.; Hahn, Amanda; Chevallier, Coralie; Kapucu, Aycan; Karaaslan, Aslan; Leongoméz, Juan David; Sánchez, Óscar Reyes; Valderrama, Eugenio; Vásquez-Amézquita, Milena; Hajdú, Nándor; Aczél, Balázs; Szécsi, Péter; Andreychik, Michael R.; Musser, Erica D.; Batres, Carlota; Chuan-Peng, Hu; Liu, Qing-Lan; Legate, Nicole; Vaughn, Leigh Ann; Barzykowski, Krystian; Golik, Karolina; Schmid, Irina; Stieger, Stefan; Artner, Richard; Mues, Chiel; Vanpaemel, Wolf; Jiang, Zhongqing; Wu, Qi; Marcu, Gabriela; Stephen, Ian D.; Lu, Jackson G.; Philipp, Michael C.; Arnal, Jack; Hehman, Eric; Xie, Sally Y; Chopik, William J.; Seehuus, Martin; Azouaghe, Soufian; Belhaj, Abdelkarim; Elouafa, Jamal; Wilson, John Paul; Kruse, Elliott; Παπαδάτου-Παστού, Μαριέττα; Rosa-Gómez, Anabel de la; Barba-Sánchez, Alan E.; González‐Santoyo, Isaac; Hsu, Tsuyueh; Kung, Chun-Chia; Wang, Hsiao-Hsin; Freeman, Jonathan B.; Oh, DongWon; Schei, Vidar; Sverdrup, Therese E.; Levitan, Carmel; Cook, Corey L.; Chandel, Priyanka; Kujur, Pratibha; Parganiha, Arti; Parveen, Noorshama; Pati, Atanu Kumar; Pradhan, Sraddha; Singh, Margaret Messiah; Pande, Babita; Bavoľár, Jozef; Kačmár, Pavol; Zakharov, Ilya; Solas, Sara Álvarez; Gordon‐Finlayson, Alasdair

doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, Mattarozzi et al (2015) found that women tend to perceive faces as more trustworthy than males, especially when judging female faces. Moreover, the race of the stimuli and cultural background of perceivers can also influence impressions from faces (Jones et al, 2021;Sutherland et al, 2018) and performance on a face matching task (Meissner & Brigham, 2001). Increasing the number of trials and including a more diverse set of faces might allow researchers to investigate the influence of trait variation on face matching performance more thoroughly.…”

Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Image variability and face matching

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates whether variability in perceived trait judgements disrupts our ability to match unfamiliar faces. In this preregistered study, 174 participants completed a face matching task where they were asked to indicate whether two ambient face images belonged to the same person or different people (17,748 total data points). Participants completed 51 match trials consisting of images of the same person that differed substantially on one trait (either trustworthiness, dominance or attractiveness) with minimal differences in the alternate traits. Participants also completed 51 mismatch trials which contained two photos of similar-looking individuals. We hypothesised that participants would make more errors on match trials when images differed in terms of attractiveness ratings than when they differed on trustworthiness or dominance. Contrary to expectations, images that differed in terms of attractiveness were matched most accurately, and there was no relationship between the extent of differences in attractiveness ratings and accuracy. There was some evidence that differences in perceived dominance and, to a lesser extent, trustworthiness were associated with lower face matching performance. However, these relationships were not significant when alternate traits were accounted for. The findings of our study suggest that face matching performance is largely robust against variation in trait judgements.

show abstract

Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Image variability and face matching

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We based our sample size estimates on the work of Jones et al (2021), who established that to have at least 95% power, we would need between 25 and 30 valid participants in each trait condition (see https://osf.io/x7fus/ for their code and data). We recruited 126 participants through a Research Experience Programme (REP; n = 2) and via Prolific (https://prolific.co/; n = 124).…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge of identity reduces variability in trait judgements across face images

Gogan

Beaudry

Oldmeadow

2022

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Faces vary from image to image, eliciting different judgments of traits and often different judgments of identity. Knowledge that two face images belong to the same person facilitates the processing of identity information across images, but it is unclear if this also applies to trait judgments. In this preregistered study, participants (N = 100) rated the same 340 face images on perceived trustworthiness, dominance, or attractiveness presented in randomised order and again later presented in sets consisting of the same identity. We also explored the role of implicit person theory beliefs in the variability of social judgements across images. We found that judgements of trustworthiness varied less when images were presented in sets consisting of the same identity than in randomised order and were more consistent for images presented later in a set than those presented earlier. However, knowledge of identity had little effect on perceptions of dominance and attractiveness. Finally, implicit person theory beliefs were not associated with variability in social judgements and did not account for effects of knowledge of identity. Our findings suggest that knowledge of identity and perceptual familiarity stabilises judgements of trustworthiness, but not perceptions of dominance and attractiveness.

show abstract

To Which World Regions Does the Valence-Dominance Model of Social Perception Apply? [ Registered Report Stage 1 - Protocol]

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Image variability and face matching

Image variability and face matching

Knowledge of identity reduces variability in trait judgements across face images

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About