Tobacco cessation interventions for young people

Fanshawe, Thomas R; Halliwell, W. H.; Lindson, Nicola; Aveyard, Paul; Livingstone‐Banks, Jonathan; Hartmann‐Boyce, Jamie

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003289.pub6

Cited by 137 publications

(146 citation statements)

References 268 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

130

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, comprehensive interventions are considered necessary for effectiveness. Previous research has shown that the complex interventions, including multiple mechanisms of change, are most effective (Fanshawe et al, 2017). A possible add-on to GNG trainings is attentional bias modification (ABM), in which the attention of participants is trained away from the targeted stimuli (i.e., smoking pictures) and towards neutral or control stimuli.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?

Scholten

Granic

Chen

et al. 2019

Psychology & Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Smoking is one of the leading public health problems worldwide. The inability to quit smoking may be the result of the amplified value of smoking-related cues and inhibitory control deficits. Previous research has shown that pairing substancerelated cues with no-go trials in go/no-go training reduces the value of these cues, an effect known as devaluation. The current experiment investigated the devaluation effect of go/no-go training on smoking-related cues, and compared this effect between smokers and nonsmokers. Design and Main Outcome Measures: 39 smokers and 43 nonsmokers were trained to respond immediately to neutral stimuli, but inhibit their reaction when smoking stimuli were presented. Before and after training, participants evaluated smoking and neutral stimuli, where part of these stimuli were subsequently presented in the training, and the other part was not used in training. Results: Not responding to smoking stimuli in go/no-go training decreased subsequent evaluations of trained smoking stimuli compared to untrained smoking stimuli, thereby replicating food and alcohol studies and extending the devaluation effect to smoking-related cues. This devaluation effect was found for both smokers and non-smokers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?

Scholten

Granic

Chen

et al. 2019

Psychology & Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Future research will have to examine these processes, and identify and measure key behavioral variables involved in the process of change. Tobacco use among teenagers remains a problem, however, most tobacco control programs for adolescents are based around the prevention of initiation of smoking or tobacco use 27 . In the Indian context, tobacco prevention and life-skills programs have been implemented for adolescent cohorts, and some have even demonstrated effectiveness in trials 28,29 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various tobacco cessation interventions for adolescents have been tested globally, including psychosocial and behavioral approaches (such as school and community-based programs, pharmacotherapy, and tobacco control policies), but these interventions had mixed results 30 . It appears that the most significant therapeutic effect in teenagers was observed for self-monitoring and coping skills, motivational strategies (reducing ambivalence to change), group counselling, and addressing social influences that affect smoking behavior 27,[30][31][32][33] . The National Tobacco Control Program in India has made provisions for cessation services, a national quitline, and mobile-phonebased cessation support program 24 , yet, tobacco cessation interventions designed specifically for adolescents are few in the country.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does adding a psychosocial cessation intervention to an existing life-skills and tobacco-prevention program influence the use of tobacco and supari among secondary school students?: Findings from a quasi-experimental trial in Mumbai, India

Chatterjee¹,

Gupte²,

Mandal³

et al. 2019

Tob. Prev. Cessation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION This study aimed to test whether school-going adolescents who self-report tobacco and/or supari use are more likely to quit if a school-based psychosocial cessation intervention is added to an existing life-skills and tobaccoprevention program. METHODS A quasi-experimental trial with pre-test and post-test 20 weeks after the intervention was conducted with students from low-income families in 12 schools in Mumbai; six schools were randomly assigned to the intervention and the remaining to the comparison condition. Participants were students from grades 7, 8 and 9 who self-reported tobacco and/or supari use. Intervention schools received six sessions of LifeFirst, a psychosocial group-based tobacco cessation intervention program, in addition to SuperArmy, a school-wide lifeskills and tobacco-prevention program. Trained counselors facilitated the cessation intervention, which spanned five months. All students in comparison schools received only SuperArmy. The outcome measures were self-reported use of tobacco-only, supari-only, and tobacco plus supari in the past 30 days. RESULTS The number of all users decreased by 19.1% in the intervention and 18.7% in the comparison schools at post-test. Although this reduction was significant (p<0.001) within each group, the difference between intervention and comparison schools was not significant. Further segregation by type of product used showed that for tobacco-only users there was a non-significant increase of 1.7% in intervention schools, and a significant 26.2% increase (p<0.001) in the comparison group. Tobacco plus supari use declined in both groups; however, supari-only use fell by 14.8% in the intervention and 32.7% in the comparison schools (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The combination of a cessation intervention along with the life-skills and tobacco-prevention program appear to have halted tobacco-only use in the intervention group. Future research needs to determine whether students are substituting supari for tobacco and to understand the psychological mechanisms underlying the cessation intervention and the interaction between cessation and prevention-only interventions.

show abstract

“…The transtheoretical model (TTM) is an empirically validated model of individual behavioural change, which involves progress through a series of stages to make a particular behavioural change (Leer, Hapner, & Connor, 2008). TTM-based interventions have been applied to facilitate health behavioural changes, such as physical exercise (Pinto, Dunsiger, Farrell, Marcus, & Todaro, 2013), smoking cessation (Fanshawe et al, 2017;Spencer, Adams, Malone, Roy, & Yost, 2006) and weight management (Lee, Park, & Min, 2015), studies of which continue to demonstrate positive effects. As far as we know, there have been few studies of patients with an ostomy using TTM as an interventional tool to provide continuous and dynamic education.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of transtheoretical model‐based intervention on the self‐management of patients with an ostomy: A randomised controlled trial

Shen

Wang

et al. 2019

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and objectives To determine the effect of a transtheoretical model (TTM)‐based intervention on patients with an ostomy and provide patient‐centred, accessible assistance and dynamic education to improve patient self‐management. Background Proper self‐management may promote the rehabilitation of patients with an ostomy. TTM‐based interventions have resulted in positive health behavioural changes. Design Randomised controlled trial performed according to the CONSORT guidelines. Subject and setting The sample comprised 55 men and 37 women (24–77 years old, mean ± SD = 52.8 ± 11.13 years). The study settings included three tertiary hospitals in Changsha, Hunan, China. Methods The 92 patients, recruited from August 2012 to March 2013, were randomised into a control group and an intervention group. Randomisation was done by using a block randomisation list with a block size of 4. Self‐management behaviours were assessed at the baseline, 2 days before discharge and after 1, 3 and 6 months of follow‐up. The chi‐squared test, independent sample t test and repeated measures analysis of variance were used to analyse the data. Results Patients in the intervention group were more likely to be at the action and maintenance stages compared with those in the control group. We also observed significant improvements in the self‐management ability in the process of change, the decisional balance and self‐efficacy in the intervention group compared with those in the control group after four intervention sessions and up to 6 months of follow‐up. No serious intervention‐related adverse events were observed. Conclusions The TTM‐based intervention had positive effects on self‐management behaviours of patients with an ostomy. Relevance to clinical practice The TTM‐based intervention had positive effects on self‐management behaviours of patients with an ostomy and may provide a reference for health providers to develop behaviour promotion programmes to improve the self‐management of patients with an ostomy.

show abstract

Tobacco cessation interventions for young people

Abstract: Analysis 2.4. Comparison 2 Comparison of theoretical basis of behavioural interventions, Outcome 4 Complex theoretical model with stage of change, motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioural therapy and/or social cognitive theory vs control.

Cited by 137 publications

References 268 publications

Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?

Do smokers devaluate smoking cues after go/no-go training?

Does adding a psychosocial cessation intervention to an existing life-skills and tobacco-prevention program influence the use of tobacco and supari among secondary school students?: Findings from a quasi-experimental trial in Mumbai, India

Effects of transtheoretical model‐based intervention on the self‐management of patients with an ostomy: A randomised controlled trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About