2009
DOI: 10.1080/10509670903196058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco Smoking Among Incarcerated Individuals: A Review of the Nature of the Problem and What is Being Done in Response

Abstract: Smoking is a major health problem, however the issue is even more pronounced among those incarcerated in prisons, where smoking rates are often three times that of the general population. While effective treatments have been demonstrated in the tobacco literature, research examining treatment within prisons is limited in scope. This article reviews the existing literature evaluating the extent of this problem, its demonstrated effects, and the responses by health care and correctional authorities. Overall, thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implications of our study are consistent with other literature on smoking cessation in prison ( Djachenko et al , 2015 ; Eadie et al , 2012 ; Richmond et al , 2009 ) and implementation of the smokefree prisons ( Foley et al , 2010 ; Hefler et al , 2016 ; Collinson et al , 2012 ). First, the importance of ensuring that imprisoned smokers have access to low cost or free evidence-based smoking cessation interventions, is widely recognised ( Butler and Yap, 2015 ; Donahue, 2009 ; Ritter, 2014 ) and is confirmed by this study. Given that imprisoned smokers might feel some ambivalence or even hostility about enforced smoking abstinence, it is important that considerable efforts are made to reduce barriers to engagement with services – as far as resources permit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The implications of our study are consistent with other literature on smoking cessation in prison ( Djachenko et al , 2015 ; Eadie et al , 2012 ; Richmond et al , 2009 ) and implementation of the smokefree prisons ( Foley et al , 2010 ; Hefler et al , 2016 ; Collinson et al , 2012 ). First, the importance of ensuring that imprisoned smokers have access to low cost or free evidence-based smoking cessation interventions, is widely recognised ( Butler and Yap, 2015 ; Donahue, 2009 ; Ritter, 2014 ) and is confirmed by this study. Given that imprisoned smokers might feel some ambivalence or even hostility about enforced smoking abstinence, it is important that considerable efforts are made to reduce barriers to engagement with services – as far as resources permit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Consistent with this, an investigation into prisoner smoking behaviors in Poland demonstrated that 75% of those sampled attempted to quit in the past year (Sieminska, Jassem, & Konopa, 2006). In the United States, smoking bans have increasingly been implemented in local, state, and federal prisons; however, questions remain about the long-term effectiveness of this approach in reducing smoking postrelease (see Donahue, 2009). Overall, smoking is a major public health problem in prisons worldwide, rates are disproportionate as compared to the general population, prisoners who smoke also appear to have some desire to quit, and empirically supported methods of reducing this behavior may be important in addition to facility-wide smoking bans.…”
Section: Modifiable Risk Factors For Cad: Their Relationship With Prisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies measuring return to tobacco smoking after release from prison in the United States have found that the majority return to smoking on the day of release (Clarke et al, 2013; Lincoln et al, 2009). Ultimately, while correctional smoking bans may reduce prisoners’ smoking in the short term, the evidence suggests that they fail to produce long-term smoking abstinence (Donahue, 2009). The WISE study (Clarke et al, 2013) provides evidence for the effectiveness of an intervention using a combination of CBT and MI for promoting smoking cessation among former prisoners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite short-term benefits associated with smoking bans (Binswanger et al, 2014), the majority of prisoners return to smoking upon release (Clarke et al, 2013; Lincoln et al 2009), suggesting that these bans result in short-term tobacco abstinence only (Donahue, 2009). Furthermore, recent studies (Cropsey & Kristeller, 2005; Kauffman et al 2011) suggest that not all prisoners adhere to smoking bans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%