2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tobacco use and some characteristics of tobacco users. Preliminary results of "Kardiovize Brno 2030"

Abstract: Kuřáctví a některé charakteristiky uživatelů tabáku. Předběžné výsledky projektu "Kardiovize Brno 2030"(Tobacco use and some characteristics of tobacco users. Preliminary results of "Kardiovize Brno 2030")

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of the present study was to identify the socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with the current and past smoking rates in the Brno population and propose recommendations for effective and targeted population-based interventions to reduce smoking prevalence in the population. This study is part of the larger cross-sectional survey Kardiovize Brno 2030 to examine the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the Brno population [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the present study was to identify the socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with the current and past smoking rates in the Brno population and propose recommendations for effective and targeted population-based interventions to reduce smoking prevalence in the population. This study is part of the larger cross-sectional survey Kardiovize Brno 2030 to examine the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the Brno population [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with the results of a population survey EHIS, the consumption of F&V in our sample was higher among women (14). Smoking was lower in our sample (29,30). At least one of five assessed lifestyle risk factors was found in the majority of the examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%