1981
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198111000-00101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toe blood pressure by photo plethysmography: An index of healing in forefoot amputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Paaske & Tonnesen (1980) found that digital pressures below 10 mm Hg were associated with an 82 per cent risk of amputation, and Barnes (in discussing the paper by Gibbons et al 1979) stated that minor amputations of the feet healed in non-diabetics at digital pressures above 10 mm Hg and that diabetics failed to heal when the digital pressure was below 25 mm Hg. The above data on digital healing pressures are consistent, but critical healing values of SDBP of as high as 45 mm Hg have also been reported in series of diabetics (Carter 1973, Bone & Pomajzl 1981. The present paper confirms our previous findings (Holstein & Lassen 1980), i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Paaske & Tonnesen (1980) found that digital pressures below 10 mm Hg were associated with an 82 per cent risk of amputation, and Barnes (in discussing the paper by Gibbons et al 1979) stated that minor amputations of the feet healed in non-diabetics at digital pressures above 10 mm Hg and that diabetics failed to heal when the digital pressure was below 25 mm Hg. The above data on digital healing pressures are consistent, but critical healing values of SDBP of as high as 45 mm Hg have also been reported in series of diabetics (Carter 1973, Bone & Pomajzl 1981. The present paper confirms our previous findings (Holstein & Lassen 1980), i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The ankle pressure is the most widely used parameter. Some authors have found the ankle pressure to be valuable (Carter 1973, Raines et al 1976, Verta et al 1976, Baker & Barnes 1977, Wagner & Buggs 1978, Holstein & Lassen 1980, Nicholas et al 1982, while other authors have found it less useful (Gibbons et al 1979, Mehta et al 1980, Bone & Pomajzl 1981. A gray zone of healing is poorly defined and failures are not infrequent at high pressures, either because of infection or because ankle pressures are estimated too high at medial sclerosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toe pressures measured with plethysmography may be a more accurate reflection of blood supply to the foot (143) and may provide better prediction of wound healing than ankle pressure or AAI (122,144,145). However, toe pressures measured with pulse-volume recordings are thought to have poor reproducibility (137), especially in the presence of autonomic neuropathy (146).…”
Section: Peripheral Vascular Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that ankle pressure levels <50-80 mmHg indicate poor wound healing or healing only after major amputation (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15). The predictive value of ankle pressure has, however, not been confirmed by others (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). An ischemic index between blood pressure levels in the ankle and brachial arteries has also been used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be avoided when systolic toe pressure is used. Toe pressure levels 25-30 and up to 50-55 mmHg have been found to indicate a good prognosis for wound healing, whereas healing did not occur with pressures <20 to 40-45 mmHg (5,6,8,9,17,23,24). Inotherstudies, however, toe pressure did not predict wound healing (7,19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%