2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10624-014-9353-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tofu feminism: can feminist theory absorb evolutionary psychology?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However and in line with other feminist critique (see e.g. Allen et al, 1975;Hoquet, 2010;Kelly, 2014;Rose and Rose, 2001), the analysis of the lecture in Intervention 3 illustrates how the Stone Age discourse risks reproducing an essentialist, deterministic and androcentric notion of gender that is potentially limiting, damaging and denigrating for both women and men. On the one hand, the Stone Age discourse in this context positioned women as inferior and problematic, resonating with Birke's assertion that biomedical practices in general have been "notoriously negative in its descriptions of women's bodies" (Birke, 2003: 43).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However and in line with other feminist critique (see e.g. Allen et al, 1975;Hoquet, 2010;Kelly, 2014;Rose and Rose, 2001), the analysis of the lecture in Intervention 3 illustrates how the Stone Age discourse risks reproducing an essentialist, deterministic and androcentric notion of gender that is potentially limiting, damaging and denigrating for both women and men. On the one hand, the Stone Age discourse in this context positioned women as inferior and problematic, resonating with Birke's assertion that biomedical practices in general have been "notoriously negative in its descriptions of women's bodies" (Birke, 2003: 43).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…From within the field of evolutionary theory, feminist evolutionary psychology (FEP) and feminist sociobiology is critical of the paucity of focus on, and the minimisation of, women in human evolution (Fehr, 2012;Hrdy, 1981;Hubbard, 1983; and see also Sokol-Chang and Fisher, 2013), Critiques have also been concerned with how evolutionary theories, specifically EP and sociobiology, tend to be essentialist, deterministic and androcentric (see e.g. Allen et al, 1975;Fausto-Sterling, 1992;Hoquet, 2010;Kelly, 2014;Rose and Rose, 2001),with political consequences that have the potential to exacerbate social injustices (Higgs and Jones, 2003;Jackson and Rees, 2007; see also Choi, 2001). Jackson and Rees (2007) argue that in the context of the "siren" narratives of human development in evolutionary accounts, "[c]ultural complexity and behavioural diversity are sidelined, becoming irrelevant as the 'universal' elements of human development are revealed" (Jackson and Rees, 2007: 922).…”
Section: An Evolutional Approach To Health Promotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…general psychology and evolutionary biology. This criticism often comes from feminists (Kelly, 2014), qualitative researchers, and people who are gay or bisexual (Jonason and Schmitt, 2016).…”
Section: Evolutionary Psychology and Lgbtq+ Issues: A Qualitative Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminist critics assert that evolutionary psychology is the newest tool used to uphold the status quo (Kelly, 2014). Rose and Rose (2010) claim that EP continues a history of biology being used to "justify forms of social domination, from discrimination and exclusion to genocide."…”
Section: Evolutionary Psychology and Lgbtq+ Issues: A Qualitative Stumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation