2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TOKAM-3D: A 3D fluid code for transport and turbulence in the edge plasma of Tokamaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a flux-driven model is preferred over a fixed-gradient model because the former is closer to experimental conditions, where profiles result from a balance between sources and losses and are a-priori unknown, exhibiting richer physics such as the appearance of avalanches 6 and self-consistent interactions between the background and the fluctuations. Such fluid flux-driven simulations have emerged, [6][7][8][9] allowing to simulate SOL plasma turbulence and shedding light on the crucial physical phenomena at play in this region. In a recent publication, 10 it has been shown that the gradient-removal theory is able to predict relatively well the sustainable pressure gradient inside the SOL for 3D fluid simulations in limited geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a flux-driven model is preferred over a fixed-gradient model because the former is closer to experimental conditions, where profiles result from a balance between sources and losses and are a-priori unknown, exhibiting richer physics such as the appearance of avalanches 6 and self-consistent interactions between the background and the fluctuations. Such fluid flux-driven simulations have emerged, [6][7][8][9] allowing to simulate SOL plasma turbulence and shedding light on the crucial physical phenomena at play in this region. In a recent publication, 10 it has been shown that the gradient-removal theory is able to predict relatively well the sustainable pressure gradient inside the SOL for 3D fluid simulations in limited geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These equations are general, and can be formulated in an arbitrary coordinate system. Note that similar equations are implemented in other edge and SOL turbulence codes [25,17,[26][27][28][29]. In GBS,…”
Section: Fluid Model Of the Sol Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the FCI method has been tested for closed field line configuration only. Additionally, several magnetohydrodynamic and turbulence studies have been performed without taking advantage of field-aligned property [14][15][16][17]. Although the required resolution in such cases is higher compared to field-aligned methods, the implementation is usually simpler.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the uncertainties in making these predictions is the transport across the magnetic field, which is not well described by diffusion [4,5], and is thought to be turbulent [6]. Since the fluctuations can be of similar spatial scales and magnitude to average profiles, significant effort has been devoted to developing and testing 3D flux-driven fluid turbulence simulation codes, including GBS [7,8], TOKAM-3D [9] and TOKAM3X [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%